Skip to main content

Muta Marriages

 MUTA MARRIAGES

By: Robin Pandey                                                           Date: 02/03/2022

 The word Muta literally means 'enjoyment' and in its legal context it may be rendered, according to Heffening, as 'Marriage for pleasure'. Muta may be defined as a temporary union of male and female for specified duration, on payment of some consideration. It is a temporary marriage for a fixed period for a certain reward paid to the woman. The specified period may be a day, a month, or a year or a term of years. 

Origin of Muta Marriages: In the earlier days of Islam, when the Arabs had to live away from their homes for a considerably long period either on account of wars or on trade-journeys, they used to satisfy their sex-desires through prostitutes. In order to avoid the development of prostitution in the society and to confer legitimacy upon children of such unions, temporary marriage was recognized and permitted by the Prophet for some time. The institution of Muta was fairly common in Arabia both before and at the time of the Prophet. But later on, when he felt that this concession was being exploited, he prohibited it absolutely.

No School except Ithna Asharia Shia School tolerates this Practice 

It is fairly certain that this institution was tolerated by the prophet for some time but all schools of law except one, the Ithna Asharia Shia School, are agreed that finally he declared such unions as unlawful. This practice was really suppressed and ruthlessly condemned by the Caliph Omar. Since the Ithna Ashari do not accept the first three Caliphs, they continue to recognize the Muta. It is not recognized in Sunni law because according to that sch0ol the marriage contract should not be restricted in its duration and the words used at the time of proposal and acceptance must denote an immediate and permanent union. Thus under Sunni law, a marriage specifically declared for a limited period is void. Hence Muta marriage is void under the Sunni law but valid under Shia law. The practice of Muta is not very common in India, and in Lucknow and other places where there is a Shia population, women of the classes do not contract Muta marriages. In Iran and Iraq, Muta generally descends to the level of legalized prostitution.

Essentials of Muta Marriages the Muta Marriages must be contracted according to the rules prescribed by Ithna Asharia law. The essentials of such a union are four: the form, the subject, the period and the dower. A Muta marriage contracted against any of the following legal conditions is an unlawful union:

(1) The Form: As regards the form, there must be a proper contract declaration and acceptance are necessary. The parties must have attained the age of puberty and must be of sound mind. The consent of both the parties must be free. There must not exist any prohibited degree of relationship between the parties.

(2) The Subject: As regards the 'subject', a Shia male may contract Muta marriage with a Muslim, Christian, Jewish or a fire-worshipping woman but not with the follower of any other religion. Muta marriage with a Hindu woman is void. The rule of limiting the number of wives to four as regards regular marriages, does not apply to Muta marriage (Baillie). A Shia male may contact Muta marriage with any number of women. A female Shia is not free to contact Muta with a non- Muslim.

(3) The Term: The period for which the Muta is being contracted, must be clearly specified. As a matter of fact, the fundamental difference between a Muta and a Nikah is that, in a marriage if its  period has been specified the marriage becomes a Muta whereas a marriage without any specific period is always a Nikah. The use of the word “Mutta” in itself does not render a marriage temporary. If a Muta form of marriage has been contracted but its duration has not been specified it is regarded as a permanent marriage (Nikah). Where two persons having marriage under the Muta form for a fixed period continue to live as husband and wife beyond the expiry of that period or till the death of the husband, the presumption in the absence of evidence to the contrary will be that marriage has been extended.

 (4) The Dower (Maher): The dower (consideration) must be specified at the time of the contract. When the term and the dower have been fixed, the contract is valid. If the term is fixed, but the dower is not specified, the contract is void. But if the dower is specified and the term is not fixed, the contract, though void as Muta, may operate as a "Permanent Marriage". It must be noted that specification of the dower is necessary for the validity of a Muta form of marriage but it is not essential for a permanent marriage (Nikah).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more