Skip to main content

Political parties in India

 Political parties in India

In a democratic society, political parties are crucial. India is a democratic and federal country with autonomous state and federal governments in their own spheres. People in India, particularly in villages and small towns, are tremendously interested in political ideology, and they begin to adhere to it firmly. Political parties play an important role in India's parliamentary democracy, and they have power over the country's political activities. According to India's preamble, "we, the people of India, offer ourselves our Constitution."

In India, absolute power is in the people's hands. They play a direct role in government decision-making by electing their candidate. Candidates run for office based on the ideologies of political parties because if these parties are not successful in the country, then everyone wants to run for office, resulting in chaos. As a result, such political parties are required to maintain the core of democracy.

Every political party has its own ideology and set of daily items that its candidate must adhere to. There is a concept of a two-party or one-party system in many nations, with countries like India, Pakistan, and Nepal having a multiparty system. Mr. Nehru, the Honourable Prime Minister at the time of independence, wanted the opposition to emphasise the governing party's faults. Following it, a slew of regional or national parties emerge. Following it, a slew of regional or national parties emerge. According to electoral commission data, there are now 58 political parties registered.

Introduction

"Without Parties, an Electorate Would Either Be Important or Destructive by Engaging in Impossible Policies That Would Only Worry the Political Machine."

"A political party is an association or body of individual citizens of India registered with the commission as a political party under section 29A of the People's Representation Act 1951. Political parties are unquestionably one of a democracy's most visible institutions. For most regular folks, democracy is synonymous with political."

Assume you travel to rural parts of the United States and chat with people who are less educated. In this case, you may encounter people who are unaware of our Constitution or the nature of our country. Our political parties, on the other hand, are likely to be recognisable to them. On the other hand, visibility does not imply acceptance. The majority of people hold political parties in high regard. They are prone to blaming political parties for all of the issues that plague our democracy and political life.

Political parties have come to symbolise social and political divisions. As a result, it's reasonable to wonder if political parties are necessary. Around a hundred years ago, just a handful nations in the world had political parties.

These days, there are very few people who do not have a party. Why have political parties become so widespread in today's democracies? Before we can comprehend why we need political parties, we must first define them and what they do."

Definition

A political party is a collection of individuals who seek for office in order to maintain the government in power. They come to an agreement on societal policies and goals that will benefit everyone. Because people have various ideas about what is beneficial for them, all political parties aim to persuade voters that their policies are superior than others'.

They intend to put these ideals into effect by garnering electoral support. As a result, political parties serve as a metaphor for society's basic political divisions. Parties imply PARTISANSHIP since they are about a segment of the community. As a result, the faction a political party represents, the policies it supports, and the interests it protects determine its identity.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree