Skip to main content

Schools of Hindu law: Mitakshara Law

 Schools of Hindu law: Mitakshara Law


Mitakshara school bases its law of inheritance on the principle of propinquity i.e. one who is nearer in blood relationship succeeds. Mitakshara does not give full effect to this principle, it has subsidiary rules which limits this principle:

  1. Exclusion of females from inheritance  

  2. Preference of agnates over cognates. 


In 2005 doctrine of son’s right by birth in joint family was amended, now both son and daughter got equal interest by birth in the coparcenary property of Mitakshara joint family. The biggest change that came after the amendment was that every member of the joint Hindu family became a coparcener.  


The unobstructed heritage is by survivorship and the obstructed heritage would be decided through succession.


  • It gives the basis of coparcenary at the first time at the birth of the son. 

  • Sapinda relationship is the basis on which inheritance is determined. 

  • Each son at birth acquires equal interest with his father and after death of the father, the son takes the property not as his heir but by survivorship. 

  • It is a creation not out of law but a desire to live jointly. Income in Mitakshara families belong to the entire family as a group of people and no member has the right to claim absolute right in that property.  

  • One can demand partition of such Hindu undivided family property.

  • Every coparcener takes a defined ownership which is based on fractions and has been looked at from the point that what is the particular numerical quantification of that person’s right in the property. The percentage may fluctuate depending on the number of births and deaths.

  • It is unity of ownership. 

  • Hindu Succession Act (Sec. 8-13), rules for Hindu undivided family  property. When these rules are applied, individuals are assigned a share at the time of their birth. All these distributions happen according to the class and entry which is made in their  respective schedules under the succession act. 

  • Anybody can claim their share as soon as they are able to. 

  • In Moro vishwanath v. Ganesh vitthal, the Supreme Court defined coparcenary in certain terminology. It was held that coparcenary property is held in collective ownership by all coparceners in a quasi- corporate capacity. Incidents of coparcenary means accrual of rights of inheritance to the coparceners will happen under what circumstances. Incidents summarised in the case:

  1. Lineal male descendants of a person upto the third generation get ownership in the ancestral properties of such person. 

  2. The lineal male descendants of a person can at any time ask for their share in the property by asking for partition. 

  3. Each member of the coparcenary till the time partition happens has got an ownership extending over the entire property conjointly/ together with the other coparceners such that the enjoyment of properties is in common. 

  4. Because of such co-ownership, the enjoyment and possession of the properties is common. 

  5. No coparcener can alienate the property unless it is for a necessity without the agreement of the other coparceners. 

  6. The interest of any deceased coparcener on the time of his death will be passed on to the surviving coparceners. 


The court also held that every coparcener and every other member of the joint family has the right of maintenance out of the joint family property. This right of maintenance is going to subsist throughout the lifetime of the member as long as the family is remaining jointly. 


In case of an illegitimate child, he will not be considered a coparcener but a member because the mother will not be a member of the joint Hindu family but this does not take away his right to inherit when partition happens. He can claim a right in the ancestral and property of the father. As he is not a coparcener, he cannot demand for a partition as well. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services

  Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services In the dynamic world of business, legal support is crucial to ensure smooth operations, mitigate risks, and navigate regulatory landscapes. Lexis and Company offers Virtual Corporate Law Services to businesses in the UK, USA, Canada, Singapore, Dubai, and Australia , assisting with mergers, acquisitions, business contracts, compliance, and corporate governance. Key Features of Virtual Corporate Law Services 1. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Legal Support We provide comprehensive legal services for mergers and acquisitions , including due diligence, structuring deals, drafting agreements, and navigating regulatory approvals. Benefits: Ensures smooth and legally sound M&A transactions. Minimizes risks during corporate restructuring. Protects your business interests in high-value deals. Trending Hashtags: #MergersAndAcquisitions #BusinessDeals #CorporateLaw #LegalSupport #VirtualLegalExperts 2. Business Contracts and Ag...
Post a Comment
Read more

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43

 Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43 CITATION AIR 1966 SC 43 COURT Supreme Court of India JUDGES/CORAM Justice K.S. Shah and Justice R. Bachawat DATE OF JUDGEMENT 22.03.1965 Facts: The facts of the case are as follows: The appellant was a dealer in a food grains at Dhar in Madhya Pradesh prosecuted in the Court of Additional District Magistrate for possessing in stock maunds and 21/4 seers of wheat for the purpose of sale without license. Subsequently appellant was charged for committing an offence under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Thereafter the appellant pleaded there was no intention to contravene any provisions of the law and the grains were stored upon filing an application for license and upon believe that it will be issued to him. The appellant further stated that he continued to submit returns on the food grains stored and purchased to the respected authority. Thus, the appellant was acquitted in the Court of Additional District Magistra...
Post a Comment
Read more