Skip to main content

Schools of Hindu law: Mitakshara Law

 Schools of Hindu law: Mitakshara Law


Mitakshara school bases its law of inheritance on the principle of propinquity i.e. one who is nearer in blood relationship succeeds. Mitakshara does not give full effect to this principle, it has subsidiary rules which limits this principle:

  1. Exclusion of females from inheritance  

  2. Preference of agnates over cognates. 


In 2005 doctrine of son’s right by birth in joint family was amended, now both son and daughter got equal interest by birth in the coparcenary property of Mitakshara joint family. The biggest change that came after the amendment was that every member of the joint Hindu family became a coparcener.  


The unobstructed heritage is by survivorship and the obstructed heritage would be decided through succession.


  • It gives the basis of coparcenary at the first time at the birth of the son. 

  • Sapinda relationship is the basis on which inheritance is determined. 

  • Each son at birth acquires equal interest with his father and after death of the father, the son takes the property not as his heir but by survivorship. 

  • It is a creation not out of law but a desire to live jointly. Income in Mitakshara families belong to the entire family as a group of people and no member has the right to claim absolute right in that property.  

  • One can demand partition of such Hindu undivided family property.

  • Every coparcener takes a defined ownership which is based on fractions and has been looked at from the point that what is the particular numerical quantification of that person’s right in the property. The percentage may fluctuate depending on the number of births and deaths.

  • It is unity of ownership. 

  • Hindu Succession Act (Sec. 8-13), rules for Hindu undivided family  property. When these rules are applied, individuals are assigned a share at the time of their birth. All these distributions happen according to the class and entry which is made in their  respective schedules under the succession act. 

  • Anybody can claim their share as soon as they are able to. 

  • In Moro vishwanath v. Ganesh vitthal, the Supreme Court defined coparcenary in certain terminology. It was held that coparcenary property is held in collective ownership by all coparceners in a quasi- corporate capacity. Incidents of coparcenary means accrual of rights of inheritance to the coparceners will happen under what circumstances. Incidents summarised in the case:

  1. Lineal male descendants of a person upto the third generation get ownership in the ancestral properties of such person. 

  2. The lineal male descendants of a person can at any time ask for their share in the property by asking for partition. 

  3. Each member of the coparcenary till the time partition happens has got an ownership extending over the entire property conjointly/ together with the other coparceners such that the enjoyment of properties is in common. 

  4. Because of such co-ownership, the enjoyment and possession of the properties is common. 

  5. No coparcener can alienate the property unless it is for a necessity without the agreement of the other coparceners. 

  6. The interest of any deceased coparcener on the time of his death will be passed on to the surviving coparceners. 


The court also held that every coparcener and every other member of the joint family has the right of maintenance out of the joint family property. This right of maintenance is going to subsist throughout the lifetime of the member as long as the family is remaining jointly. 


In case of an illegitimate child, he will not be considered a coparcener but a member because the mother will not be a member of the joint Hindu family but this does not take away his right to inherit when partition happens. He can claim a right in the ancestral and property of the father. As he is not a coparcener, he cannot demand for a partition as well. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more