Skip to main content

secularism

 SECULARISM 


THE WORD “SECULAR” MEANS “SEPARATE” FROM RELIGION OR RELIGION.

THE MAN OF THE WORLD DOES NOT OWE HIS MORAL STANDARDS TO ANY RELIGION. HIS VALUES ​​ARE THE RESULT OF HIS LOGICAL, SCIENTIFIC THINKING.

SECULARISM MEANS RELIGIOUS, POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL DIVISIONS, WITH RELIGION BEING REGARDED AS A PERSONAL MATTER.

IT EMPHASIZED THE SEPARATION OF THE STATE FROM RELIGION AND THE COMPLETE FREEDOM OF ALL RELIGIONS AND THE TOLERANCE OF ALL RELIGIONS.

IT ALSO REPRESENTS EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADHERENTS OF ALL RELIGIONS, AND THERE IS NO PARTIALITY OR PREJUDICE FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS.


THREAT TO SECULARISM


ALTHOUGH, INDIA'S CONSTITUTION STATES THAT THE STATE IS COMPLETELY NEUTRAL IN ALL RELIGIONS, OUR SOCIETY IS DEEPLY RELIGIOUS.

THE MIXING OF RELIGION AND POLITICS, WHICH INCLUDES VOTES FOR REASONS OF ORIGINAL IDENTITY SUCH AS RELIGION, RACE AND ETHNICITY, PUTS THE INDIAN RELIGION AT RISK.

SOCIAL POLITICS WORKS BY CONSOLIDATING THE SOCIAL SPHERE, BY SPREADING MYTHS AND SUPERSTITIONS TO A FEW PEOPLE, BY UNDERMINING RATIONAL VALUES ​​AND BY MAKING PROPAGANDA AND DIVISIVE POLITICS.

THE POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT OF ANY ONE RELIGION LEADS TO POLITICAL RIVALRY BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS, THUS LEADING TO RELIGIOUS CONFLICT.

ONE OF THE MANIFESTATIONS OF COMMUNISM IS CIVIL UNREST. IN THE PAST TOO, COMMUNISM HAS BEEN SEEN AS A MAJOR THREAT TO THE COUNTRY’S INDIAN POLITICAL INDUSTRY.

THE RISE OF HINDUISM IN RECENT YEARS HAS RESULTED IN MOBS ATTACKING JUST BECAUSE OF ALLEGATIONS OF SLAUGHTERING CATTLE AND EATING BEEF.

IN ADDITION TO THIS, THE FORCED CLOSURE OF THE MONASTERIES, CAMPAIGNS AGAINST THE ‘LOVE JIHADIST’, CONVERSION OR GHAR-WAPSI (MUSLIMS ARE FORCED TO CONVERT TO HINDUISM), ETC. STRENGTHENS SOCIAL INCLINATION IN SOCIETY.

ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM OR REVIVAL PURSUES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ISLAMIC STATE BASED ON SHARIA LAW THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE IDEOLOGY OF THE STATE AND DEMOCRACY.

IN RECENT YEARS THERE HAVE BEEN ERRONEOUS INCIDENTS OF MUSLIM YOUTH BEING ENCOURAGED AND STRENGTHENED BY GROUPS LIKE ISIS WHICH IS A GREAT TRAGEDY IN INDIA AND THE WORLD.


SUGGESTIONS 

IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY, THE BEST WAY TO PROMOTE RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY IS TO INCREASE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RATHER THAN TO USE THE WORLD TO THE FULL.

IT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THE PRECIOUS EDUCATION THAT ENABLES THE NEW GENERATION TO UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE NOT ONLY ITS RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS BUT ALSO THOSE OF OTHER RELIGIONS IN THE WORLD.

THERE IS ALSO A NEED TO IDENTIFY THE SAME FRAMEWORK OR SHARED SET OF VALUES ​​THAT ALLOW DIFFERENT GROUPS TO LIVE TOGETHER.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LAUNCHING A SOCIAL REFORM CAMPAIGN AS A COMMON COMMUNITY CODE ARE TO CREATE A CONDUCIVE ENVIRONMENT AND CREATE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL HARMONY.


CONCLUSION  

IN THE PAST FEW YEARS INDIAN REPUBLIC HAS FACED CERTAIN PROBLEMS RELATED TO SECULAR IDENTIFY DUE TO RISING JINGOIST BELIEFS IN THE NATION WHICH HAVE PLACED THE NATIONALIST AND PATRIOTIC BELIEFS OF A PARTICULAR COMMUNITY UNDER THREAT . IT IS EVIDENT FROM THE FACTS AND FINDINGS OF THE PAST THAT IN ORDER TO PROMOTE SECULARISM WE HAVE TO HAVE FORMATION OF RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT REACH OUT TO INCLUSIVENESS OF THE INHABITANTS RATHER THEN THEIR DISSEMINATION . IT IS TO BE NOTED THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD LOOK INTO THE LARGE SCALE MARGINALISATION OF MUSLIMS AND OTHER MINORITIES IN THE NATION WHICH IS A THREAT TO INDIAN DEMOCRACY’S TRUE NATURE . 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree