Skip to main content

The Indian Contract Act, 1872

 THE INDIAN CONTACT


ACT, 1872


The law of contract in India is contained in the

Indian Contract Act, 1872. This act is based

mainly on English Common Law which is to a

large extent made up of judicial precedence.

(There being no separate Contract Act in

England). It extends to the whole of India

except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and

came into force on the first day of September

1872. The Act is not exhaustive. It does not deal

with all branches of the law of contract. There

are separate Acts which deal with contracts

relating to negotiable instruments, transfer of

property, sales of goods, partnership, insurance,

etc. Again the Act does not affect any usage or

custom of trade (Sec. 1). A minor amendment in

Section 28 of the Act was made by the Indian

Contract (Amendment) Act, 1996.


Definition of Contract


According to Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract

Act: “An agreement enforceable by law is a

Contract”. A Contract, therefore, is an

agreement the object of which is to create a

legal obligation i.e., a duty enforceable by law.

From the above definition, we can find that a

contract essentially consists of two elements: (a)

An agreement, and (b) Legal obligation i.e., a

duty enforceable by law.


Kinds of Contracts


 Valid Contract:

A valid contract is an agreement

enforceable by law. An agreement becomes


enforceable by law when all the essential

elements of a valid contract are present.


 Voidable Contract:

According to Section 2 (i), “an agreement

which is enforceable by law at the option of

one or more of the parties thereto, but not at

the option of the other or others, is a

voidable contract”. Thus, a voidable contract

is one which is enforceable by law at the

option of one of the parties. Until it is

avoided or rescinded by the party entitled to

do so by exercising his option in that behalf,

it is a valid contract.


Usually a contract becomes voidable when

the consent of one of the parties to the

contract is obtained by coercion, undue

influence, misrepresentation or fraud. Such a

contract is voidable at the option of the

aggrieved party, i.e., the party whose


consent was so caused (Sec. 19 and Sec. 19

A). But the aggrieved party must exercise

his option of rejecting the contact (a) within

a reasonable time, and (b) before the rights

of third parties intervene, otherwise the

contract cannot be repudiated.


 Void Contract:

Literally the word ‘void’ means ‘not

Binding in law’. According to the term ‘void

contract' implies a useless contract which

has no legal effect at all. Such a contract is a

nullity, as for there has been no contract at

all.


Section 2(j) defines:

“ A contract with ceases to be enforceable

by law becomes void, when it ceases to be

enforceable.” It follows from the definition

that a void contract is not void from it’s

inception and that it is valid and binding on


the parties when originally entered but

subsequent to its formation it becomes

invalid and destitute of legal effect because

of certain reasons.


The reasons which transform a valid

contract into a void contract as given in the

Contract Act are as follows:


1. Supervening impossibility (Sec. 56 )


2. Subsequent illegality (Sec. 56)


3. Repudiation of a voidable contract.


4. In the case of a contract contingent

on the happening of an uncertain future

event, if that event becomes impossible.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more