Skip to main content

The State Judiciary

 The state Judiciary


 Introduction 


The Constitution provides for the establishment of High Courts in all the states. The Parliament, by law, establishe a common High Court for two or more States or Union Territories. At present there are 25 High Courts in the country. Among the Union Territories, Delhi alone has a high court of its own. The Guwahati High Court has jurisdiction over the state of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura. Punjab and Haryana also share one high court between them at Chandigarh.

The jurisdiction of a High Court of a state is co-terminus with the territorial limit of the State. For Example: If there is a common High Court for two or more States or Union Territories, then the jurisdiction of each Court extend to the territorial limits of the State or Union Territories.

The organization of subordinate Courts in India are more or less uniform throughout the country.

A State is divided into a number of districts, each under the jurisdiction of a principal Civil Court presided over by a district judges.

Sometimes he is assisted by Additional District Judges.

The administration of justice is conducted by two types of courts - Civil Courts and Criminal Courts.

In recent times reforms have been introduced in the criminal procedure with a view to expedite the disposal of case, improve efficiency, prevent abuses and offer relief to the weaker section of society.

The high court stands at the head of the Judiciary in the State. The following sections outline the structure of the state Judiciary.


Salient Features of the state Judiciary


 High Court

The high court stands at the head of the Judiciary in the states: 

Power of the High Court

  • Original Jurisdiction

 The high court hears the following cases when there are brought in the first instance, without being heard in Subordinate Courts.

 In regards to the State Revenue and its collection.

In regards to admiralty, wills, marriage laws, company laws and contempt of court. In regards to Fundamental Rights it is empowered to issue writs for the enforcement of these rights.

The High Courts of Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai have the powers to withdraw criminal cases from the subordinate courts for conducting trial themselves in the sessions court.


  • Revisory Jurisdiction 

It implies that High Court can withdraw cases from subordinate courts for its consideration if it involves a substantial question of law. The case is returned to the code from which it was transferred to the copy of which comment on the question of law so that it can be disposed in keeping with the viewpoint of the High Court.


  • Appellate Jurisdiction 

The high court hears appeals from the lower courts in the state and also appeals from suits filed on the original side of the High Court.

The High Court hears appeals in three types of cases – Civil, Criminal and Revenue. 

In criminal cases if the district and sessions court sentence a convicted person to death, an appeal is made to the High Court.


  • Supervisory Jurisdiction 

The High Court also exercises power of supervision and control over the work of all courts and also the tribunals in the State. (Except courts relating to the Armed Forces).

 The High Court may interfere with an inferior court or tribunal have acted without jurisdiction and passed orders beyond its powers.

It has a power to make and issue general rules and prescribe forms for regulating the proceedings in such courts.


  • Administrative Powers

 The High Court supervise the working of the subordinate courts, frame rules and regulations for the conduct of their business and inspect their records. They can transfer cases from one court to another. All appointments transfer and promotions of district judges are made by the Governor on the advice of the high court and Public Service Commission.


  • Power to issue Writs 

The High Court has also been conferred the power to issue writs not merely to safeguard Fundamental Rights, but for any other purpose. A writ is an order from a judicial authority asking person to perform some act or refrain from performing an act. Through theses writs the power of the Legislature and the Executive is controlled.

The writs that are issued are Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo Warranto and Certiorari.



Judges of High Court 


  • Appointment of judges to the High Court 


The number of judges of the High Court has not been fixed by the constitution. The strength of each High Court is fixed by the President from time to time.

 The president appoints the Chief Justice of the High Court in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the State.

 Judges are also appointed by the President, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned.


  • Qualifications 


A judge must fulfill the following requirements 

  1. He must be a citizen of India.

  2. He must have held a judicial office in the territory of India for 10 years or more.

  3. He must have been an advocate of one or more high courts for 10 years in succession.

  4. He should be a distinguished jurist, in the opinion of the President of India.


  • Tenure

A Judge of the high court holds office until

the age of 62 years and is removable in the same manner as a judge of the Supreme Court of India i.e., on the ground of proved “misbehavior” or “incapacity”.


  • Salary 

The Chief Justice of the high court gets a salary of rupees 70,000 per month while the judges over rupees 70,000 per month.

 They are also entitled to allowances and pensions on retirement.


  • Independence of the Judiciary

 The Constitution provides for the Independence of the judges of the High Court. A judge of the high court cannot be removed except on the ground of misbehavior or of incapacity. 

His salary allowances and pensions cannot be varied and or not subject to vote of the Legislature (except under a proclamation of financial emergency). 

All administrative expenses of the high court are charged on the consolidated fund of India. Hence, the salary and expenses of a judge and other members of the judiciary are not subject to variation.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more