Skip to main content

Agreement in Restraint of Trade

 Agreement in Restraint of Trade (Sec. 27) of Indian Contract Act 1872

According to section 27, “Every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void.” An agreement which unnecessarily curtails the freedom of a person to trade is against public policy. Restraining a person from carrying on a trade generally aims at avoiding competition and has monopolistic tendency and this is both against an individual’s interest as well as the interest of the society and on that ground such restraints are discouraged by law.

Section 27, which declares an agreement in restraint of trade as void, does not allow any distinction between a total restraint or a partial restraint. Thus, whether the agreement imposes a total restraint or a partial, the agreement is void.

Exceptions to an agreement in restraint of trade

  1. Sale of Goodwill

When there is a sale of business by a party along with its goodwill then the buyer may make an agreement with seller not to carry on the business in competition with the buyer.

Case Law- Nordenfelt v. Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co. Ltd. (1894) A.C. 535.

  1. Exception under The Partnership Act, 1932

Sec. 11(2), Indian Partnership Act, permits the partners of a partnership firm to make a contract which provides that a partner shall not carry on any business other than that of the firm while he is a partner will not carry on their own business ignoring the partnership business.

  1. Restraint by a contract of service 

 An agreement of service under which an employee agrees that he will serve a particular employer for a certain duration, and that he will not serve anybody else during that period, is a valid agreement. During the period of employment, the employer has an exclusive right to avail the services of his employee and, therefore, a restraint on the employee to serve somebody else at the same time is reasonable. Such an agreement is not hit by the doctrine of restraint of trade.

Case Law- Charlesworth v. Mac Donald I.L.R, (1898) 23 Bom. 103.


  1. Trade combinations

Sometimes, the traders or manufacturers combine together to eliminate competition as between themselves and makes agreements fixing minimum price, regulating the supply of goods and putting profits in the common pool and dividing the same amongst themselves. Such agreements are neither void on grounds of being opposed to public policy, nor are they deemed to be in restraint of trade.

Case Law- English Hop Growers v. Dering, (1928) 2 K.B. 174.


  1. Solus agreement 

When the seller or the manufacturer of a certain product may agree that he will supply the whole of his product to a particular single buyer only, or, similarly, a buyer may agree that he will purchase all his requirements of a certain commodity from a particular seller or manufacturer only and none else. Such agreements are called Solus agreement.

Case Law- Sheikh Kalu v. Ram Saran Bhagat, (1908) 13 Cal. W.N. 388.



Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti