Skip to main content

AN OVERVIEW MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (AMENDMENT) BILL 2022

 AN OVERVIEW MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (AMENDMENT) BILL 2022


INTRODUCTION


On March 25, 2022, the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha. The bill aims to make changes to the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act of 1957, which was passed by Parliament.

It intends to bring together the Capital's three municipal corporations — South, North, and East — ten years after the civic body's trifurcation.

The Municipal Corporation is the urban local authority in India that is in charge of the development of any Metropolitan City with a population of over one million people.


Municipal Corporations are founded by acts of state legislatures in the United States, and by acts of Parliament in the Union Territories.

In 1688, Madras became India's first municipal corporation, followed by municipal corporations in Bombay and Calcutta in 1726. Based on the population of a city, each municipal region is divided into geographical constituencies known as wards. Each ward elects a representative, who is elected by the ward's residents. On the basis of adult franchise, members of the wards committee are elected for a five-year tenure. A councillor, sometimes known as a corporation,is a person elected to represent a certain ward.




BACKGROUND:


For increased efficiency, the government proposed in 2011 that the MCD (Municipal Corporation of Delhi) be trifurcated.


After the proposal was accepted by the ministry of home affairs in November 2011, the Delhi government called a special assembly session and passed the Delhi Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Bill in December 2011.

In January 2012, the final notification for the trifurcation was released, separating the municipal bodies of North, South, and East Delhi, with 104 awards handed to the first two and 64 to the latter.


NEED FOR REUNIFICATION?

1. Face Multiple Issues: Trifurcated MCDs (Municipal Corporation of Delhi) have faced a number of issues over the years, including non-payment of safai karamcharis (sweepers) salaries, uneven property tax distribution among the three civic bodies, inefficient management, and growing losses, among others.



2. Unequal Division: In terms of geographical divisions and revenue-generating potential, the trifurcation was uneven. As a result, the three firms' resources were vastly inadequate in comparison to their duties.



3. Widening Gaps: The gap has widened over time, putting the three municipal corporations in a financial bind and rendering them unable to pay their employees' salaries and retirement benefits on time, posing a serious impediment to the delivery of civic services in Delhi.



4. The growing population and urbanisation in India's cities necessitated the establishment of a local governing body capable of collecting property taxes and fixed grants from the state government in order to provide essential community services such as health care, education, housing, and transportation.




PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION


Except for the integration of Article 40 in the Directive Principles of State Policy, there is no provision in the Indian Constitution for the formation of local self-government.

The 74th Amendment Act of 1992 included a new Part IX-A to the Constitution, which deals with municipal and Nagar Palika administration.

Articles 243P to 243ZG make up this section. The Constitution was also amended to include a new twelfth schedule. There are 18 things on the 12th schedule.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree