Skip to main content

An overview of Martial Rape

 Violence against women is not new to our society, a place where a woman is expected to remain silent no matter how hard or how badly she is being treated. Society has created this vague, imaginary idea of an ideal whom. One who listens to what people say, who obliges to every order, who remains quiet and suffers every kind of agony with mainly is physical, emotional, and mental. Thus we can say that we live in a misogynistic society and the time is yet to come where it is going to be an Equalitarian society i.e., a gender-neutral society.


Introduction:

The term Marital Rape not only talks about Rape, but also talks about violation of one’s Right to Life, Right to live with Dignity, but also talks about how a relationship like marriage, wherein both husband and wife are expected to live with each other for the rest of their lives, with complete trust on one another can and is broken for a 2minitue pleasure called “SEX”.


Our society from the very beginning has been ranting about how a wife is supposed to keep her husband happy to make sure he doesn’t go out in search of effecting and if he does go out to find or making other illicit relationships with other women, then our society comes forth to justify the acts of the man by blaming the women for not being able to take care, give the required love, attention, mental, emotional, and especially physical support that a man needs.


But when the same is done by a woman i.e., when she doesn’t get the required love, care support mentally, emotionally, and physically, then the very same society calls her names like “ Slut, Bitch, Rand, etc” the woman is blamed for not being able to keep her emotions, needs aside and be loyal to her husband. The wife is expected to scarify her mental, emotional, and physical needs aside just to please her husband or a man’s ego, because apparently, a woman has to swallow the guilt, embarrassment caused by her husband, but a man’s ego is too big to accept one’s own mistake.


Today it can be considered as one of the most controversial, debatable topics, issues in countries like India. Our government i.e., our parliament, is dominated by male candidates, our judicial system is also dominated by men, our corporate positions are predominantly filled by men. Women are to date being considered as weak-links, underdogs of the society.

To understand from where does this ideology comes from, we need to go back to our mythological roots, and the main focus is usually on Ramayana. In Ramayana from the very beginning to the very end, it is seen that the main female character Sita from time to time has been asked to give Agnipariksha by her husband Ram to prove her purity, dedication, love for her husband, but we do not get to see at any given point that Ram was asked or had to give the same Agnipariksha to prove his love, purity, dedication towards Sita.


Thus it was already presumed from the very beginning that it was the women who were weak and had to be tested from time to time and the men of the society no matter what would not indulge, cannot be weak in any situation or circumstances in life by our mythology.

This ideology has been entertained, adopted by the people and the same is being followed but this also clearly shows that our society has from the beginning been a male patriarchal society, meaning the men of the society have always been regarded higher than women and they could no possible wrong. Even if both the genders are at fault, the women are made to suffer.


And on the other hand Draupadi the most powerful female mythological character from Mahabharata isn’t considered to be a part woman should play. She stood against the wrong done against her or any other person, she fought for her dignity, her pride, she stood for herself against over 100 men, she fought with her husband for, betting her over a game to his cousins like she was his property, a non-living thing which had no emotions, self-esteem, values.


But the character of Draupadi is seen as an arrogant lady, over-ambitious, overachiever, who had led to the destruction of her husband’s brothers and her children. But here one thing which isn’t understandable is that, was it not her husband who proposed to bet on her for a game with his cousins? Was it wrong of her to fight for her pride which her husband was supposed to protect? Was it wrong of her to be embarrassed for the acts done to her in front of an assembly consisting only and only men?

Marital Rape:

When a husband lures his wife into consenting to sex and on her refusal, denial forces him over her consent, and commits the act, it is said to be a Marital Rape. No matter how long they have been married to each other, if a wife hasn’t consented or wishes to have sex with her partner, her wish has to be obliged, but in today’s scenario husbands choose to torture their wives, mentally, emotionally, and physically to any possible extent, just to get what they want.


Marital Rape isn’t new to our society; every wife at some point of time in her life was a victim or fell prey to it. A marital relationship is based on trust and this trust is broken by lustful feelings of a husband over his wife’s consent, dignity, and faith in him that he would do no wrong to her, hurt or harm her in any way.


In various cultures Marital Rape is not considered, as a sexual relationship between a married husband and wife isn’t something abnormal, this is said to be an impossible phenomenon. Marriage is said to revolve in and around sexual intercourse, which is presented to all as a forbidden fruit that one only gets to experience after being legally married to their better half.

Types/ ways of Marital Rape:

Beating Blue & Black:

The husband hits his wife on her refusal to consent for sexual intercourse, which he claims to be his right as her lawfully wedded husband. It goes to an extent where she goes unconscious, after which he exploits her dignity without her knowledge and she only realizes it when she gains her consciousness.

 

Physical force:

The husband forces his wife into having sexual intercourse when she is conscious, sound-minded. He physically torches her which not only affects her mentally but also takes an emotional and physical toll on her later.

 

Verbal:

It can also be verbal i.e., the husband abuses his wife commenting on her physical appearance, abusing her family for her appearance, etc., which also causes long-term mental trauma.

 

Blackmail:

The husband blackmails his wife regarding the humiliation of her family, in front of her colleagues, in-laws, hurt children’s, case embarrassment in front of friends, harm her family, etc.

 

Emotional:

The husband abuses, torches his wife to an extent wherein she is so emotionally drained, she cannot think straight, and he takes advantage of the same, to commit his acts.

Legality:

Almost 231 countries have recognized Marital Rape as a Crime and only 36 countries have failed to recognize the same some of countries are India, China, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Egypt, Tajikistan, Myanmar, Yemen, Kuwait, Oman, etc.,


Marital Rape is an infringement of Fundamental Rights under Article 21- Right to Life & Dignity, wherein its states that No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty, except according to the procedure established by law. Here the right of the wife to refuse sexual intercourse with her husband should stand against the will, force of her husband’s lust, will of having intercourse.

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code defines Rape as a man is said to commit rape when he has intercourse with a woman without her consent, by undue influence, coercion, blackmail, by drugging her i.e., intoxicating her, of she is a minor i.e., under 16yrs of age. This section comes with an exception with regards to Marital Rape stating that a man having sexual intercourse with his wife doesn’t amount to rape unless his wife is below 15yrs of age.


This again violates Fundamental Rights under Article 14 that is the Right to Equality, wherein every person irrespective of their gender has a right to be treated equally with its opposite gender. The above-said exception is discriminating against married women. They have no right to protect themselves from the cruel acts committed by their husbands, which is a great failure of our Indian Constitution though being the largest, lengthiest in the world.


Marital Rape does exist and the same is being recognized by various courts but at the same time there is no punishment, provisions for the same to protect the dignity of married women in India in various judgments like Nimeshbhai Bharathbhai Desai vs the State of Gujarat, the Supreme Court held that, as per the current laws, a wife cannot file or initiate proceedings against her husband for Marital Rape. The husband cannot be charged for Marital Rape, even if the wife is forced against her will to have sexual intercourse.


Though Section 376 states the punishment for Rape, but it doesn’t cover Marital Rape due to an exception. Section 377 deals with unnatural intercourse but it doesn’t cover bestiality, brutality against the wife. But the Hon’ble Court with Mr. Justice J.B Pardiwala did recognize the need, necessity of abolition of the exception under Section 375, as it is discriminatory towards the woman and especially married women. The bench acknowledged that the requirement of Marital Rape laws has been rising and it is high time when the government starts focusing on this on a priority basis.

Though the Right to Privacy has been recognized by the Hon’ble Courts i.e., a woman’s right to sexual privacy as a Fundamental Right, and forced, coerced sexual intercourse would be a violation of one’s Right to Life, Right to Live with Dignity and Right to Privacy, yet there is no law as of now to protect the integrity of married women from being raped day after day by their husbands. Just because they are married the rights of women to consent for sexual intercourse are considered to have been revoked forever. This affects a woman mentally, emotionally, and physically to an extent where she is unable to recover from the trauma as she is forced to live the same life for the rest of her being.


The Hon’ble Kerala High Court recognized Marital Rape as a valid ground to seek Divorce on 30th July 2021. It recognized the Right to protect one’s own dignity, Physical and mental integrity and any violation, disrespect to the same is a punishable offense. It is the right of the woman who has married a man to refuse or consent to sexual intercourse and if the decision of the woman isn’t accepted by the man and if he force’s her into having intercourse, he is violating her Right to life and Personal Liberty. A husband cannot make his wife suffer for his pleasure, and violate his wife’s dignity. The individuals are free to perform conceptual sexual intercourse. Thus the court allowed the petition filed by the wife for divorce on grounds of cruelty and dismissed the petition filed for Restitution of Conjugal Rights.

Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 defines Restitution of Conjugal Rights, wherein either husband or wife without substantive reason withdraws from the society of another, this is a legal ground for divorce, which is time and again misused by the husband whose wife leaves the marital home tired of the harassments, both mental and physical cruelty, just so he can take her back home and continue to harass and violate her dignity, integrity and her rights as an individual .


The United Nations Convention on Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women has recognized Marital Rape as a Criminalized offence i.e., it is a serious crime that infringes the Rights, Dignity of married women around the world and India was one of the signatories at this Convention. The 42nd Law Commission that was headed by Justice Verma has submitted a report pressing upon the importance, urgency to criminalize Marital Rape as the only relief made available to married women is the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Parliament has failed to acknowledge the same till date.

Conclusion:

There is going to be a constant spike in cases with regards to Marital Rape and it is high time the government both at the center and state level recognizes this issue, the urgency, and necessity for laws to be enforced, enacted to protect the rights and dignity of a married woman. The need for Marital Rape laws is was never this bad. Irrespective of being married, unmarried, girl child, strong laws are required to eradicate the social evil called RAPE from the country. And the Judiciary, who is appointed protector of Fundamental Rights by the Constitution of India, needs to do its part in protecting and saving millions of women of the nation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree