Skip to main content

Animal welfare board of India VS A. Nagaraja and Ors

 Animal welfare board of India VS A. Nagaraja and Ors.

In Tamil Nadu, a traditional sport known as Jallikattu exists. In this sport, the bull is released in public / in front of a crowd, and then individuals attempt to seize the bull and perch on top of it, where they must remain until the bull attempts to flee. This sport has resulted in numerous fatalities among those who are part of the crowd. There were also numerous women and children present, and this circumstance and cause of death prompted major concern about animal welfare.

Due to the fact that the bull was tortured with sharp sticks. Their tails are severely bowed to the point of fracture in the base of their spinal cord, and they are thrashed with sticks. rubber belt and are also bitten prior to release to enrage the bull, causing him to rush quickly and destroy whatever in his path. As a result of the anger created to torture him, the bull also murdered a number of people. Additionally, there were numerous accounts of bulls being made to consume alcohol in order to disorient and agitate them they also employed chilly powder in their eyes to increase their craziness and wildness, and occasionally in their anus. These factors also contributed to the deaths of numerous bulls during the festival. In 2010, the Animal Welfare Board of India filed a complaint in the Supreme Court against this traditional sport, requesting that it be banned for the safety of the animal and the people who die each year as a result of this activity's harm to both. In 2011, the Ministry of Environment and Forests prohibited the use of bulls as performing animals, however the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act maintained the sport.


Tamil Nadu's high court upheld the continuation of this customary practise under the jurisdiction of the Tamil Nadu statute. The AWBI then petitioned the government to issue a notification prohibiting the use of bulls in this sport, training, and display. The supreme court of India acknowledged the magna carta of animal rights under article 51A(g). The supreme court ruled in favour of the animal protection board of India and banned this sport for being too cruel to the bulls and also to the crowd members who attempted to jump on it. Both the and humans sustain major injuries and, in some cases, die. And this had an effect on the fundamental right guaranteed by article 21, namely the right of animals to life. Thus, the supreme court's ruling was extremely beneficial for bulls and extremely well-reasoned, as it was extremely difficult to choose between ancient practises and newly upgraded laws and society. Customs that violate people's and animals' fundamental rights cannot be continued and must be abolished. Nobody can be harmed in such a way. It is a direct violation of the right to life.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more

business tips

1. Have a clear vision for your business and strive to achieve it. 2. Hire great people and give them ownership in the company. 3. Provide excellent customer service. 4. Establish yourself as an expert in your field. 5. Develop relationships with key suppliers, customers, and partners. 6. Keep track of your finances and invest in marketing and innovation. 7. Utilize digital platforms to reach a larger audience. 8. Take calculated risks and back yourself. 9. Continuously strive to improve your products and services. 10. Make customer satisfaction your priority.
Post a Comment
Read more

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more