Skip to main content

Article 21: Analysis of Rights of Sex Workers

 ARTICLE 21: ANALYSIS OF RIGHTS OF SEX WORKERS


In order to ensure the well-being of the citizens, it is the prerogative of the state to protect their

human rights. It can take a toll on the development of a state if violations such as discrimination in

terms of access to education and healthcare, ill-treatment at work persist. Similarly, the minority

groups are subjected to discrimination even by the law enforcement officers which leaves these

groups helpless and exposed to more abuse.

India despite having passed numerous legislation has not been able to allow various groups such as

women and people belonging to lower castes to have equal access to facilities such as education and

health care due to poor implementation of the said laws.

Indian women have been at the receiving end of this discrimination for a long time now which is

evident in the poor literacy and earning rates that women have compared to men. 1 Within this

already vulnerable group lies sex workers who have been subjected to legal and societal atrocities.

Most of these sex workers are introduced to the profession at an early age without their consent and

consequently, they become more vulnerable to physical, economic, and psychological violence and

abuse. According to a study conducted in some villages of Nepal and the Sangli district of

Maharashtra, more than half of the workers were forced into sex work before they were even 14

years old. 2 Even though child sex work is illegal in India, there are more than 40% of sex workers

who are children. 3


The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 is the main legislation that deals with sex workers in

India, it was implemented to give effect to United Nations International Convention for the

“Suppression of Women in Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation in Others” signed by India in

1950. 4 There is no provision in the law that makes prostitution in itself illegal if it is practiced

independently, however, ITPA prohibits certain outward demonstrations such as maintaining a

brothel, soliciting or seducing, or carrying out prostitution within 200 meters of any public place. 5

This act underwent two amendments in the years 1978 and 1986 to make it more inclusive in terms

of gender. However, it is still laden with certain shortcomings. To discuss a few in terms of Article

21:

1 Sofia Gruskin and Daniel Tarantola, HIV/AIDS, Health, and Human Rights, 6 Can HIV/AIDS Pol'y & L Rev. 24, 24-

29 (2001).

2 See K.K.MUKHERJEE, FLESH TRADE: A REPORT (Ghaziabad, India: Gram Niyojan Kendra 1989) and

SANDIP BANDYOPADHAYA, THE "FALLEN" LEARN TO RISE: THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF STD-HIV INTERVENTION PROGRAMME

(Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee 1998).

3 Id.

4 THE LEAFLET, https://www.theleaflet.in/flipside-of-new-human-trafficking-bill/ (last visited Nov. 13, 2021).

5 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, No. 104, Acts of Parliament, 1956 (India).


Article 21: The Indian Constitution grants Article 21 as a fundamental right that provides for

protection of Life and Personal Liberty i.e. it guarantees to the citizens and non-citizens of India a

right to live with dignity, right to livelihood, right to privacy, right to health etc. Nonetheless, sex

workers have to face discrimination even when it comes to basic healthcare facilities, especially

after the HIV epidemic. An individual is prescribed an HIV test only in cases of TB, STD, or

diarrhoea but hospitals make it mandatory for sex workers to get an HIV test done even if they are

suffering from common cold. These actions of society lead to alienation and stigmatisation of the

sex workers. Another instance was observed in a hospital in Kolkata where it is mandatory for

every sex worker, visiting the hospital, to give a blood sample without any justification. This

practice is a clear violation of the right to privacy which is given to the citizens of India under

Article 21. 6

Another area of concern is earnings for these workers, especially for child sex workers. Whatever

they earn from their services, the majority of it is seized by the brothel owners and the residuary

amount is insufficient to even afford a proper meal a day. Lack of access to education and poverty

further deteriorates their condition. In the Sonagachi district, the literacy level of sex workers was

found to be around 11%. 7

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree