Skip to main content

Basics of Copyright by Mayurakshi Sarkar at Lexcliq

 Basics of Copyright by Mayurakshi Sarkar at Lexcliq

It is governed by the Copyright Act 1957 (the Act), which is supported by the Copyright Rules 1958 (the Rules). In 2012, the Copyright Act underwent significant revisions. Copyright law in India is derived from judicial rulings because the country has a common law legal system, which relies on case law to interpret and make precedents. Members of the Berne Conventions and the Universal Copyright Convention, India is also a signatory to these agreements. The International Copyright Order, 1999, has also been approved by the Indian government. All works first published outside of India will be given the same treatment as if they were first published in India under this Order.

In India, the following types of works are protected by copyright:

  • original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works;

  • cinematograph films;

  • sound recording

Literary Works

Regardless of the quality or style of the work, "literary works" comprises all works that are in print or written. Anyone who considers themselves a "literary person" is not limited to those who write prose and poetry. Unless the work is a collection of words that were assembled without the use of literary skill, it will not be protected by copyright. The legal status of a computer programme in India is the same as that of a piece of literature.

Dramatic Works

No cinematograph film can be considered a dramatic work, but any material for recitation, choreography, or entertainment in a dumb show with a defined scenic arrangement or acting form can be considered a dramatic production.

Musical Works

To be considered a "musical work," one must include the music itself, as well as its graphic notation, but must exclude any words or actions intended to be sung, spoken, or performed in conjunction with it. Copyright protection does not need the creation of a musical piece.

Artistic Works

Painting, sculpture, drawing (including maps, charts and plans), engraving, and photography are all examples of "artistic work," regardless of whether or not they are considered to be works of art. An artistic work can have any colour scheme, style or arrangement of alphabets or characteristics.

Cinematic Movies

In the context of cinematography, "cinematograph" refers to any piece of visual recording on any medium produced through a technique from which a moving image can be formed in any way and includes a sound recording accompanying such visual recording.

Sound Recordings

No matter the media or method used to record the sounds, a "sound recording" is a recording from which new sounds can be generated. There are two types of sound recordings: phonograms and CDs.

These categories of works are all eligible for copyright protection and can be protected. If a copyright application is being made on behalf of an unpublished work, that work must be wholly original. The law only cares about the originality of one's thoughts when it comes to criminal prosecution. By signing a contract, the copyrighted works are protected and cannot be duplicated or reproduced without permission from their creators and their representatives.

The work's author can prohibit or allow anyone to:

  • make a copy of the material in any format imaginable;

  • employ the work in a theatrical or musical production;

  • use CDs, cassettes, and other recording devices to make copies of the work.

  • broadcast it in a number of different ways;

  • In other languages, do the same

In addition, moral rights, which include the right to be identified as the author of a work or to object to negative portrayal of a work, are safeguarded. Despite the fact that the author's copyright has been transferred (whole or in part), the author retains a number of specific rights granted by the Act.

The author's rights are:

 To protect their reputation,  to claim authorship of the work and prevent or seek damages in regard to any mutilation of, change to, or other act on the work that would be damaging to their honour and fame.

The legal representatives of the author can also make use of these privileged privileges and privileges. The author has a moral right to prevent alterations to his or her work even after the term of the copyright has expired, not just during that time.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree