Skip to main content

Berne Convention and WIPO

 Berne Convention and WIPO

Berne Convention

It is an international agreement governing copyright. It deals with three basic principles:

  1. National Treatment: 

  • The fact that an application has been accepted or rejected in origin state is immaterial for any particular state to consider an application for copyright in its own country. 

  • However, if the protection granted to a work expires in origin state, the other member states will not be obligated to provide protection further than that. The same will not be violative of MFN. 

  • All the work should be protected automatically, there is no need to comply with any formality for the same. It may be protected for evidentiary value.  


  1. Minimum standard of protection

  • Artistic, literary and scientific work in all forms and expression is protected under this.

  • Following rights are provided to the copyright owner:

  • The right to translate

  • The right to make adaptations and arrangements of the work

  • The right to perform in public 

  • The right to recite literary works in public

  • The right to communicate to the public the performance of such works

  • The right to broadcast 

  • The right to make reproductions in any manner or form

  • The right to use the work as a basis for an audiovisual work

  • Moral rights


  1. The duration of protection is for life of the author and 50 years post death. In case of anonymous work, the protection lasts for 50 years; for audiovisual, it is minimum 50 years from release; in case of works of applied art and photographic works, minimum 25 years from creation. 



Infringement of patent is not a criminal offence but infringement of copyright is a criminal offence when used for commercial purposes. 

Sec. 15 of copyright act lays down that if a work protectable under design act is protected under copyright and is reproduced more than 50 times. It will lose its protection under copyright law.  


WIPO

It is one of the international organisations that became the specialised agency of the UN. Its purpose is to promote the protection of IP. All the IP related treaties which resulted out of WTO meetings or agreements are managed by WIPO. It represents more than 90% of the world countries and has 193 signatories. 


Objective:

  • To promote protection of IP throughout the world through cooperation among states and other international organisations. International filing can only be done if all the IP offices of all the member states are cooperative and hence, a database is also maintained.

  • To ensure administrative cooperation among IP unions established by the treaties that WIPO administers.


Functions:

  • Normative activities: they have to create certain norms

  • Program activities: they have to provide technical assistance if required by any member state

  • International classifications and standardisation activities including cooperation between IP offices 

  • Registration activities: they provide a gateway wherein international filing is facilitated. 

  • For dispute resolution, there is WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre. It is not for member states but for companies, SMSEs, startups, inventors, artists , research and development organisations etc. Here the services are provided in a very cost efficient manner. 

  • It maintains a list of certain names of pharmaceutical combinations that cannot be used, of well known marks at a global level etc.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree