Skip to main content

CASE COMMENTARY ON NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

 CASE COMMENTARY ON NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS


INTRODUCTION 

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code imposes criminal liability on anyone who “voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature”. When the abovementioned Section was challenged in the Supreme Court of India, the Court decided to de-criminalise specific conduct as indicated in the following analysis, and the decision was hailed as a landmark precedent. By issuing this decision, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to keeping up with changing circumstances and public opinion.


THE FACTS OF THE CASE 

On January 8, 2018, a writ petition was filed at the Supreme Court before a three-judge bench. The petitioners pleaded that the "right to sexuality," "right to sexual autonomy," and "right to choose a sexual partner" be declared to be part of the right to life provided by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The petitioners also asked for Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code to be declared illegal. The Apex Court's three-judge bench concluded that the matter needed to be heard by a larger panel. As a result, when the petition was transferred, our Supreme Court's learned five judges struck down Section 377 inasmuch as it criminalised consensual sex.


ISSUES 

The fundamental question in the case was whether the non-recognition and consequent denial of expression of choice under Section 377 was in violation of the ruling in Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr. v. Naz Foundation & Ors.


SUMMARY OF COURT DECISIONS AND JUDGEMENT

When the writ petition was first presented by dancer Navtej Singh Johar, before the threejudge bench, the bench referred to the Suresh Koushal case in which the Supreme Court overturned the Naz Foundation judgement. The three-judge bench felt that there were a lot of aspects to be considered regarding Section 377- determination of “order of nature”, social morality, rights of sections of people, constitutional foundations, consenting adults, etc. Thus, the judges deemed the case fit to be considered by a larger bench. Considering the petitions and examining the same through various aspects, the learned fivejudge bench of the Apex Court gave its judgement in favour of the petitioner and unanimously held that Section 377 was unconstitutional as far as it criminalized consensual sex between two adults of same or different sex. As the judgement was given by a five-judge bench, it is a binding precedent on all courts in India.




CONCLUSION 

As a result, the Supreme Court's decision to decriminalise consensual sexual activities between two adults, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, was correct. The Court's decision to keep bestiality, sex with minors, and non-consensual sexual conduct within the scope of Section 377 was likely to close any loopholes or abuses of the legislation. As a result, the Court reversed Suresh Kumar Koushal's decision. After suffering at the hands of society and family and being labelled as "untouchables," it was past time for our Supreme Court to embrace a progressive and open mentality and accept the LGBT community as a legitimate component of Indian society.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti