Skip to main content

Child labour laws in india

 Child labour laws in India

In 2011 , the national census of India found that the total number of child labourers, aged

[5–14], to be at 10.1 million, out of the total of 259.64 million children in that age group. The

child labour problem is not unique to India; worldwide, about 217 million children work,

many full-time.

As per the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, amended in

2016 ("CLPR Act"), a "Child" is defined as any person below the age of 14, and the CLPR

Act prohibits employment of a Child in any employment including as a domestic help. It is a

cognizable criminal offence to employ a Child for any work. Children between age of 14 and

18 are defined as "Adolescent" and the law allows Adolescent to be employed except in the

listed hazardous occupation and processes which include mining, inflammable substance and

explosives related work and any other hazardous process as per the Factories Act, 1948. In

2001, an estimated 1% of all child workers, or about 1,20,000 children in India were in a

hazardous job. Notably, the Constitution of India prohibits child labour in hazardous

industries (but not in non-hazardous industries) as a Fundamental Right under Article 24.

UNICEF estimates that India with its larger population, has the highest number of labourers

in the world under 14 years of age, while sub-Saharan African countries have the highest

percentage of children who are deployed as child labourers. The International Labour

Organization estimates that agriculture, at 60 percent, is the largest employer of child labour

in the world, while the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates 70% of

child labour is deployed in agriculture and related activities. Outside of agriculture, child

labour is observed in almost all informal sectors of the Indian economy.


Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016

Government has enacted the Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016

which came into force w.e.f. 1.9.2016. The Amendment Act completely prohibits the

employment of children below 14 years. The amendment also prohibits the employment of

adolescents in the age group of 14 to 18 years in hazardous occupations and processes and

regulates their working conditions where they are not prohibited. The amendment also

provides stricter punishment for employers for violation of the Act and making the offence of

employing any child or adolescent in contravention of the Act by an employer as cognizable.

In order to achieve effective enforcement of the provisions of the Act, the amendment

empowers the appropriate Government to confer such powers and impose such duties on a

District Magistrate as may be necessary. Further, the State Action Plan has been circulated to

all the States/UTs for ensuring effective implementation of the Act.


Causes

Major causes of child employment that can be understood keeping in mind the Indian

scenario, are:

 POVERTY:

 In developing countries it is impossible to control child labour as children have been

considered as helping hand to feed their families, to support their families and to feed

themselves. Due to poverty, illiteracy and unemployment parents are unable to bear the

burden of feeding their children and to run their families. So, poor parents send their children

for work in inhuman conditions at lower wages.

 PREVIOUS DEBTS:

The poor economic conditions of people in india force them to borrow money. The Illiterate

populations go to money lenders and sometimes mortgage their belongings in turn of the debt

taken by them. But, due to insufficiency of income, debtors find it very difficult to pay back

the debt and the interest. This vicious circle of poverty drags them towards working day and

night for the creditor and then the debtors drag their children too in assisting them so that the

debts could be paid off.

 PROFESSIONAL NEEDS:

There are some industries such as the ‘bangle making’ industry, where delicate hands and

little fingers are needed to do very minute work with extreme excellence and precision. An

adult’s hands are usually not so delicate and small, so they require children to work for them

and do such a dangerous work with glass. This often resulted in major eye accidents


Constitutional Provisions for Child Upliftment:

Article 21 A: Right to Education

The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6 to 14

years in such manner as the State, by law, may determine.

Article 24: Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc.

No child below the age fourteen years shall be employed in work in any factory or mine or

engaged in any other hazardous employment.

Article 39: The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing

(e) that the health and strength of workers, men and women, and the tender age of children

are not abused and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations

unsuited to their age or strength.

Legislative Provisions Prohibiting and Regulating Employment of Children

 As per the Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986 “child” means a person

who has not completed is 14th year of age.


 The Act prohibits employment of children in 13 occupations and 57 processes

contained in Part A & B of the Schedule to the Act (Section 3).

 Under the Act, a Technical Advisory Committee is constituted to advice for inclusion

of further occupations & processes in the Schedule.

 The Act regulates the condition of employment's in all occupations and processes not

prohibited under the Act (Part III).

 Any person who employs any child in contravention of the provisions of section 3 of

the Act is liable for punishment with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less

than three months but which may extend to one year or with fine which shall not be

less than Rs 10,000 but which may extend to Rs 20,000 or both. ((Section 14).

 The Central and the State Governments enforce the provisions of the Act in their

respective spheres.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...