Skip to main content

Contingent Fees for Personal Injury Litigation

 Contingent Fees for Personal Injury Litigation

Personal injury is a legal term for an injury to the body, mind, or emotions, as opposed to an injury to property. Personal injury can be of many types it includes road traffic accidents, work accidents, tripping accidents, assault claims, or a product defect accident. Personal injury can also include mental and dental care, it may also include toxic tort, in which a contaminant transmitted by air or water causes illness, injury, or death.

A contingency fee means an arrangement where a fee of a lawyer is only charged when a lawyer successfully obtains a recovery on your behalf. the lawyer gets the amount from the reward received by the plaintiff. The lawyers, in this case, will not accept the case ad put in their efforts if they know they have some chances to lose.

 These agreements are commonplace in personal injury cases. With this agreement, the attorney agrees to handle a personal injury case for a percentage of any compensation recovered on the plaintiff's behalf. These fees can differ for different attorneys usually it is between 25 to 40 percentage.

This type of agreement benefits the plaintiff, who lacks resources to fight their case. Now the word is used instead of the costs, the contingent agreement might prevent the plaintiff to pay fees but the expenses shall be borne by the plaintiff. Fees are paid directly to attorney cost, on the other hand, are other necessary expenses related to the case that is not paid to the lawyer, eg; filing fees, court cost, photocopy expenses, expert witness fees, deposition costs. The cost doesn’t depend upon the win or loss of the case.

The second question is why the use of a contingency fee attorney for a personal claim?

The case against the public injury can help the plaintiff to recover some claim, this claim depends upon the intent or negligence of the responsible party, this compensation can be monetary or through settlement or a judgment. To claim one case should have these 4 elements. These include, party A had a duty to act reasonably according to the circumstances, party A breached the duty, party A's breach of the duty caused party B to be harmed and party B suffered monetary damages due to the harm suffered when party A breached its duty of care.  The claim might be received but it is a far-fetched case, until that time cost of litigation of a personal injury keeps on increasing as it includes investigation fees, deposition cost, and more as discussed the cost and fees are different.  This agreement helps the person to manage their case as well as the resources. Another benefit is that comes from choosing an attorney to work with the contingency fee, will help them to focus and work on the goal, this increases their efficiency.

This concludes that contingency is the perfect agreement in the case of public injury.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more