Skip to main content

Cost, Insurance, Freight Contract (CIF)

                    Cost, Insurance, Freight Contract (CIF)

CIF Contract: CIF stands for “ Cost, Insurance, and Freight” This type of contract is quite popular in Mercantile Transactions. A contract on CIF terms means contract at a price to cover cost, insurance and freight. A CIF contract is one in which the seller agrees to sell the goods at a price which is inclusive of the cost of goods, insurance and freight.

    The essential feature of CIF is the contract performance is satisfied by the delivery of document, and not by the actual delivery of the goods. A CIF contract is however not mere sale of documents, though the buyer has to pay against the delivery of documents. In other words, delivery of documents is only a symbolic delivery of the goods.

     The CIF agreement is usable for transporting goods by sea or inland waterway, Usually the seller goes for this agreement, if they have direct access to the ship, and it is makes easier for seller to load the cargo onto the vessel. It is also usable for non- containerized and bulk cargo.

For Example: A contract is entered into for the sale on C.I.F. terms of specific goods afloat, the seller being at the time in possession of the relative documents which he indorses over to the buyer. Unknown to the parties the carrying vessel had become a total loss before the bargain was struck. Under such circumstances, it was argued in Couturier v. Hastie that the purchaser bought, in fact, the shipping documents, the rights and interests of the vendor; “but the argument was rejected by the House of Lords on the ground that the parties contemplated the existence of the goods.

Thus, although a CIF contracts involves an original shipment of goods, it does not necessarily imply that such goods continue to exist at the time when the contract is made.

 Seller's Responsibilities Includes:

  • Purchasing export licenses for the product

  • Providing inspections of products

  • Any charges or fees for shipping and loading the goods to the seller's port

  • Packaging costs for exporting the cargo

  • Fees for customs clearance, duty, and taxes (for exporting)

  • Cost of shipping the freight via sea or waterway from the seller's port to the buyer's port of destination

  • Cost of insuring the shipment up until the buyer's port of destination

  • Covering the cost of any damage or destruction to the goods

  • The seller must deliver the goods to the ship within the agreed-upon timeframe and provide proof of delivery and loading.

Buyer’s Responsibilities Includes:

  • The buyer only has to pay any customs or other duties, which may impose in a CIF contract. 

  • He is bound to do so even if the goods are destroyed, for he has a remedy against the insurer of goods.

     It's important to note that when shipping internationally, there can be different risk and cost transfer points between the buyer and seller, depending on the type of shipping agreement. Under CIF, the risk transfer is at a different point than the cost transfer. The exact details of the contract will determine when the liability for the goods transfers from seller to buyer.

      Since the seller pays the shipping, freight, and insurance costs until the cargo arrives at the buyer's destination port, the cost transfer occurs when the goods have arrived at the buyer's port. However, the risk transfer occurs from the seller to the buyer when the goods have been loaded on the vessel. Although the seller must purchase insurance, the buyer has ownership of the goods once loaded onto the ship, and if the goods have been damaged during transit, the buyer must file a claim with the seller's insurance company.

     The goods in CIF agreement, the seller assumes the costs and risks associated with transport until delivery, which is when the buyer assumes responsibility. If the goods are not in accordance with the contract then the property does not passes to the purchaser. With this CIF responsibility transfers to the buyer when the goods reach the point of destination.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree