Skip to main content

Crime in US

 Crime in US
















The Black Americans in the United States have faced many unique issues. One of the matters
that have prevailed in many years is that of crime with violence. Essentially, this has not only
been an issue in the United States but has also been a prominent problem in South Africa. On
reflection, criminal violence has been the worst problem that the two countries have faced in the last two decades.
The number of firearms available in the Black American market was exceedingly high. It is
evident that the rate of acquisition of weapons among the black American community is the
largest factor that causes the huge crime rate. In the early part of the 1980’s, most of the crimes charged for were related to the use of firearms (Bennett and Fraser 94). Surprisingly, 46% of the number of murders that were committed during this period were as a result of the use of fire weapons. Instead of the problem being dealt with, the percentage of these deaths increased up to seventy one (Bennett and Fraser 95). Considerably, this exceeds the number of homicides that were reported by whites by 17% (Bennett and Fraser 95). The increase in this number of cases can be largely attributed to the high increase of weapons available in the black market in most parts of Southern America. Therefore, it is due to the poor monitoring of the illegal sales of arms that the number of homicides increased.

The rate of violence in the Black American communities was exceedingly high. When compared to other countries, the number of violence cases in the United States among the Black Americans was surprisingly superior. For instance, it exceeded the number of those in both Germany and
France by twenty-eight times (Bennett and Fraser 92). Astonishingly, these crimes were reported to be committed by members of the population aged between fifteen and twenty four years (Bennett and Fraser 92). Additionally, in all the arrests made for these crimes, a percentage of twenty had a participant who was eighteen years and below (Bennett and Fraser 92). These statistics means that, practically, a fifth of the violent crimes in the United States involved an underage Black American citizen. In 1995, the count of violence cases in the United States by Black Americans was ten times more than that in Canada (Bennett and Fraser 92). Clearly, this is a very huge difference considering that the two countries neighbor one another. That shows that the number of crimes carried out by the Black American population was tremendous.
The high crime rate among Black Americans mostly targeted the young male populace in the
United States. In 1990, most of homicidal cases were discovered to target Black American males by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (Bennett and Fraser 94). For every 27 men, one was likely to become a victim of homicide (95). Additionally, the highest number of these cases involved men between the ages of fifteen and twenty-four years. The number of crime victims within this age was around one hundred and thirty two out of one hundred thousand youths (Bennett and Fraser 95). Among these crimes, most of them ended up in deaths and fatal or permanent injuries. It is important to mention that these crimes were mostly gang-related (Bennett and Fraser 95). Therefore, this suggests that a majority of the crimes were due to cases of drug smuggling, robbery, gang fights, and issues involving initiation into the particular gangs as male youth are the highest targets for criminal gangs.
The rate of criminal violence in South Africa is also very high. Similar to the black American
society, South Africa was among the top countries worldwide in terms of violent crimes. In the later part of the 1990’s, South Africa had a murder record of sixty out of every one hundred thousand people (CSVR3). Although the numbers decreased in the period between 2008 and 2009 up to thirty nine per one hundred thousand people, it still was very high if compared to other nations. Additionally, robbery by violence was another act of violent crime that was very prominent in the country (CSVR3). In the year 2000, South Africa recorded the highest number of car robberies in the world (CSVR3): 87% of these robberies were done a gun point. Similar to the Black Americans, violent crime was very prominent in South Africa.
The number of firearms among the citizens in South Africa was high. The white populace in
South Africa was allowed to own guns. In the 1990s there were a lot of conflicts between the White South Africans and the indigenous population in the country (CSVR4). This saw to it that ownership of guns by the whites for purposes of self-protection was legalized. Consequently, this saw to it that the circulation of guns in South Africa was doubled. These guns were also given to the black allies in order to help support the apartheid rule (CSVR4). The illegal acquisition of arms in the black market also multiplied during this period as whites who had the ability to own guns sold them to criminal mobs in the country (CSVR6). This is very similar to the situation in the black American population as in both cases guns were the weapon that was used in most of the robbery and murder cases. For instance, in 2000, guns were the main weapons used to rob cars in South Africa making it the region with the highest number of car robberies.
Discrimination was a large factor that led to the high crime levels. In South Africa, there was alot of colonial oppression in the 1980’s and 1990’s (CSVR5). The colonists residing in the
country did not offer important job opportunities to the black populace in the country.
Unfortunately, this caused poverty among the indigenous Africans, later resorting to indulgence in other means of earning; theft (CSVR5). Many criminal gangs were formed and they antagonized the well-off occupants of the country. On reflection, this situation was very similar to that of the Black Americans. In the 1990’s, most of the Black Americans were not employed in the lucrative jobs in the United States (Bennett and Fraser 100). This discrimination resorted in violent crime in both countries.
There were some measures that could have been taken be to solve the crisis in these areas. One of the measures would have been to provide cheap or free health care and education to the areas that were most affected by poverty. This would have reduced the living cost for the black American community and the people of South Africa, and thus, improving their living standards and reducing the number of robbery cases. Additionally, the governments of both regions would have done regular expeditions in search of weapons owned without a license. Another remedy would be to eradicate the criminal groups in the United States and South Africa as that would reduce cases of crime and the number of youths being initiated into the security in urban centers where most of these crimes took place. With these measures in place, the rate of violent crimes would not have been so imminent on the Black Americans and South Africans.
Considerably, the surge of criminal violence has been the worst problem that has been faced by the Black Americans and in South Africa. This is evident from the tremendous number of
murders and violent crimes that occurred in South Africa and United States due to the pilferage of firearms.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree