Skip to main content

Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill

 Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill

 

 

THE BILL'S MAIN PROVISIONS:

It aims to regulate bitcoin and, apparently, prohibit all private cryptocurrencies. It also aims to provide a structure that will make it easier for the Reserve Bank of India to launch an official digital currency.

 

THE CURRENT STATUS:

 

In India, an inter-ministerial commission on cryptocurrency has suggested that all private cryptocurrencies be banned, with the exception of state-issued virtual currencies.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has also expressed concern about the cryptocurrencies that are traded in the market and has informed the government.

The Supreme Court authorised banks and financial institutions to resume services linked to cryptocurrencies in March 2020, overturning the RBI's 2018 circular prohibiting them (on the basis of "proportionality").



NEED FOR REGULATION 

Virtual coins are based on blockchain technology, which is highly secure. A wallet is linked to a private key rather than an individual person. Therefore, the Governments find it challenging to trace the origin of a transaction. Because Virtual coins use pseudonyms to carry out transactions, it has the potential of being used for illegal activities.

Another concern is that since Virtual coins are not backed by the Government or any commodity and therefore can lose their values if the promoter of the Virtual coins stops the trading activity.


BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH CRYPTOCURRENCY:


Fast and Low-Cost Transactions: Cryptocurrencies are far less expensive to use for international transactions since they don't have to go through a succession of intermediaries before reaching their final destination.

Cryptocurrency has a finite quantity, similar to gold, so it's a good place to put your money. Furthermore, the price of cryptocurrencies has risen faster than the price of other financial instruments in recent years.


As a result, cryptocurrency may become a popular investment option.




CONCERNS REGARDING CRYPTOCURRENCIES:

Advertisement Deluge: The crypto market is viewed as a method to make rapid money. As a result, there is a barrage of advertising, both online and offline, attempting to entice people to speculate in this market.


However, there are concerns that "over-promising" and "non-transparent advertising" are being used to deceive the youth.

Unregulated crypto marketplaces can be used for money laundering and terror financing, which is a counterproductive use of the technology.

The Price of Cryptocurrencies is Extremely Volatile: Bitcoin soared from USD 40,000 to USD 65,000, a new all-time high (between January to April 2021). Then, in May 2021, it plummeted, and it remained below USD 30,000 for the entire month of June.

Macroeconomic and Financial Stability: According to a group of crypto exchanges, approximately Rs 6,00,000 crore has been invested in crypto assets by Indians. The level of Indian retail investors' investment involvement in this unregulated asset class is a threat to macroeconomic and financial stability.

Issues with the Stock Market: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has stated that it has no authority over the "clearing and settlement" of crypto currencies and that it cannot provide counterparty guarantees as it does for stocks.


Furthermore, it is unclear if bitcoin is a currency, a commodity, or a security.

CONCLUSION

The proposed Bill may ideally serve to introduce a level of uniformity of understanding and serve to bring the various government agencies involved onto the same page while also providing security and helping regulate the otherwise unregulated markets and prevent its misuse.

However, on the surface the Bill seems to be very restrictive in nature as it seeks to ban all private cryptocurrencies including mining and trading therein. The Bill further seeks to promote the 'official digital currency' that is to be issued by the Central Government and the RBI
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more