Skip to main content

Cyber Crime Laws in India

 Cyber Crime Laws in India

Introduction

India's Cyber Laws prohibit any crime committed through the use of technology, such as cybercrime, in which a computer is used as a tool. As a result of cybercrime regulations, residents can't give out their personal information to anyone online. IT Act 2000 was enacted in 2000 and updated in 2008 to cover a wide range of crimes under cyber law in India since its establishment. The Act outlines the many categories of cybercrime and the penalties for committing them, as well.

Importance

As a result of the fact that India's cybercrime legislation includes and regulates all areas of transactions and activities involving the internet and cyberspace, the country's cyber laws and regulations are critical. "Electronic commerce and electronic government in India have been facilitated by India's Cyber Laws, which ensure maximum connection and minimized cybersecurity concerns. Expanding and strengthening the usage of digital media is also an important part of this effort "according to Menon, Advocate Krishnamohan K.

Development of Cyber laws in India

As our reliance on technology has grown, so has the need for cyberlaw. The advantages and disadvantages of relying on technology are like the two sides of a coin. The Information Technology Act of 2000, which came into effect at the dawn of the twenty-first century, was an important step forward in Indian cyberlaw (popularly known as the IT Act). Cybercrime was first recorded in 1820, more than a century ago.

The objective of the Information Technology Act in India is as follows:

  • To provide legal recognition for all e-transactions

  • To give legal recognition to digital signatures as a valid signature to accept agreements online

  • To give legal recognition to keeping accounting books in electronic form by bankers as well as other organizations

  • Protection of online privacy and stopping cyber crimes

The Indian IT law updated the Reserve Bank of India Act and the Indian Evidence Act. With the evolution of cyberlaw, almost all online activities came under scrutiny. However, one thing about cyber law is that there are certain areas in which cybercrime laws in India do not apply such as:

  • Negotiable Instrument being other than cheque

  • Power of Attorney

  • Will

  • The contract for Sale or Conveyance of Immovable Property

  • Central Government notified documents or transactions

Need for Cyber Laws

The terms "cyberlaw" and "cybercrime" have become more nuanced in today's more technologically advanced society. As the number of individuals using the internet grew, so did the demand for cyber laws in India. The internet and technology were initially developed for scientific research and to make human life easier. It's easy to commit cybercrimes because the internet is anonymous. As a result, a significant number of people could potentially abuse this feature.

When it comes to protecting the privacy and security of citizens' data, Tanuj Aggarwal says, "With the exponential rise in the digital space, certain reforms were greatly essential."

Steps to Prevent Cybercrime

In India's cybersecurity laws or cyber laws, it is clear that cybercrime is well protected. Prevention, on the other hand, is always preferable to treatment. To avoid a cybercrime, the following precautions should be taken:

  • Unwanted text message - We've all received texts from numbers we don't recognize. Text messages and automated voice messages from an unknown number should be avoided at all costs.

  • Mobile phone downloads - Only download from a trusted source on your mobile phone.

  • Check the seller's rating and feedback from previous customers before making a purchase. Make certain you're keeping up with the latest feedback. In addition, be on the lookout for feedback that is completely favorable to the vendor or has been posted on the same day.

  • Everyone must have gotten a phone call or a letter requesting personal information. A situation where the other person requests personal information from the requesting party. This includes the CVV code on your credit card and any embedded links in an email attachment. Never, ever respond to any unsolicited emails or phone calls.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree