Skip to main content

Environmental laws in India

 Environmental laws in India’

The need for protection and conservation of environment and sustainable use of natural

resources is reflected in the constitutional framework of India and also in the international

commitments of India. The Constitution under Part IVA (Art 51A-Fundamental Duties) casts

a duty on every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including

forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures. Further, the

Constitution of India under Part IV (Art 48A-Directive Principles of State Policies) stipulates

that the State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard

the forests and wildlife of the country.

Several environment protection legislations existed even before Independence of India.

However, the true thrust for putting in force a well-developed framework came only after

the UN Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972). After the Stockholm

Conference, the National Council for Environmental Policy and Planning was set up in 1972

within the Department of Science and Technology to establish a regulatory body to look

after the environment-related issues. This Council later evolved into a full-fledged Ministry

of Environment and Forests (MoEF).

MoEF was established in 1985, which today is the apex administrative body in the country

for regulating and ensuring environmental protection and lays down the legal and

regulatory framework for the same. Since the 1970s, a number of environment legislations

have been put in place. The MoEF and the pollution control boards ("CPCB", ie, Central

Pollution Control Board and "SPCBs", ie, State Pollution Control Boards) together form the

regulatory and administrative core of the sector.

Some of the important legislations for environment protection are as follows:

 The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010

 The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

 The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

 The Environment Protection Act, 1986

 The Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, etc.


The Environment Protection Act, 1986 (the "Environment Act") provides for the protection

and improvement of environment. The Environment Protection Act establishes the

framework for studying, planning and implementing long-term requirements of

environmental safety and laying down a system of speedy and adequate response to

situations threatening the environment. It is an umbrella legislation designed to provide a

framework for the coordination of central and state authorities established under the

Water Act, 1974 and the Air Act. The term "environment" is understood in a very wide term


under s 2(a) of the Environment Act. It includes water, air and land as well as the

interrelationship which exists between water, air and land, and human beings, other living

creatures, plants, micro-organisms and property.

 Under the Environment Act, the Central Government is empowered to take

measures necessary to protect and improve the quality of environment by setting

standards for emissions and discharges of pollution in the atmosphere by any

person carrying on an industry or activity; regulating the location of industries;

management of hazardous wastes, and protection of public health and welfare.

From time to time, the Central Government issues notifications under the

Environment Act for the protection of ecologically-sensitive areas or issues

guidelines for matters under the Environment Act.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree