Skip to main content

EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW

 EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW


Equity itself is derived from a Latin word which means Justice and egalitarianism. It is a system of

law which emanated in the English chancery and encompasses a formal body of indispensable and

procedural rules and doctrine, override common and statutory law. The law relating to equity is

largely based on precedent. Since, it is not viable on the part of the state to contrivance a

comprehensive code of law in order to supervise every eventuality.

Wherein, Law and Equity goes side by side. Equity is consequential in the legal world because men

and laws are fallible. A Court of Equity, Chancery Equity that is legally approved to apply the

principle of Equity, as opposed to the law, to cases brought before it. The principles and rules

emerging from the exercise of residuary powers, which forms the living source of the law of

the state. The system includes some portion of natural justice which is judiciary enforceable.


Equity under Indian Legal System

As a branch of the legal system Equity refers to the essence or rules arising from the

administration process of justice specifically in those cases where the areas are not

adequately covered by statute.

Equity besides supplements the law with quintessence of liberty and goodwill. In India, as a

matter of administration, there was never a well-developed Supreme court as most part of the

law for the application of the court is certified. There the court acts according to the principle

of equity, justice.

The Mohammedan law also partly lays down its origin from the principle of equity. Equity

and adequate ethics have also been expressly laid down with laws. The English laws also

contributed to the development of Equity in the jurisdiction of India. In India, the common

law doctrine of equity had been followed even after the independence.


The principle of law has been stated in various laws such as:

• The Specific Relief Act, 1877 

• ➢ The Indian Trusts Act, 1882

• ➢ The Indian Succession Act,1925 

• ➢ The Transfer of Property Act,1882 


Equity will not be a wrong to be with or without a remedy: 

➢ This maxim states that it is developed as common law which basically doesn’t lay down

any new remedies but it has only nominal damages.


Equality is equity: 

➢ This maxim means that when two or more parties have their common interest but due to

some specific reason their interest has not been qualified, then the equity as a source may

divide their interest equally.


Equitable Remedies

Injunctions: It is a type of remedy in which the court provides the certain law and order

which the parties are pressured to do or abstain from doing a certain specific task.

Specific performance: In this type of remedy, the court passes a statement to the parties in

order to fulfil certain tasks which are interlinked or already a part of a contract.

Recession:  This remedy alternatively takes back the parties to their normal position as they

were in before entering the contract.

Rectification: In this type of remedy court orders to rectify or make certain changes in the

written document so that to reflect what is actually said on the first page.  


CONCLUSION

Equity plays a crucial role in the justice delivery system. In the world of digitalization, almost

every organism is now familiar with the technological part, wherein the computers are the

best replacement for humans nowadays mainly from the position of judge, ‘feed the fact and

laws into it and getting a judgement with all accuracy’.

The importance of equity was greater emphasis than the common law system. During the

centuries it gained importance and became an integral part of an Indian legal system too.

There are certain acts which work through the principle of equity nowadays in India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree