Skip to main content

EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW

 EQUITY AS A SOURCE OF LAW


Equity itself is derived from a Latin word which means Justice and egalitarianism. It is a system of

law which emanated in the English chancery and encompasses a formal body of indispensable and

procedural rules and doctrine, override common and statutory law. The law relating to equity is

largely based on precedent. Since, it is not viable on the part of the state to contrivance a

comprehensive code of law in order to supervise every eventuality.

Wherein, Law and Equity goes side by side. Equity is consequential in the legal world because men

and laws are fallible. A Court of Equity, Chancery Equity that is legally approved to apply the

principle of Equity, as opposed to the law, to cases brought before it. The principles and rules

emerging from the exercise of residuary powers, which forms the living source of the law of

the state. The system includes some portion of natural justice which is judiciary enforceable.


Equity under Indian Legal System

As a branch of the legal system Equity refers to the essence or rules arising from the

administration process of justice specifically in those cases where the areas are not

adequately covered by statute.

Equity besides supplements the law with quintessence of liberty and goodwill. In India, as a

matter of administration, there was never a well-developed Supreme court as most part of the

law for the application of the court is certified. There the court acts according to the principle

of equity, justice.

The Mohammedan law also partly lays down its origin from the principle of equity. Equity

and adequate ethics have also been expressly laid down with laws. The English laws also

contributed to the development of Equity in the jurisdiction of India. In India, the common

law doctrine of equity had been followed even after the independence.


The principle of law has been stated in various laws such as:

• The Specific Relief Act, 1877 

• ➢ The Indian Trusts Act, 1882

• ➢ The Indian Succession Act,1925 

• ➢ The Transfer of Property Act,1882 


Equity will not be a wrong to be with or without a remedy: 

➢ This maxim states that it is developed as common law which basically doesn’t lay down

any new remedies but it has only nominal damages.


Equality is equity: 

➢ This maxim means that when two or more parties have their common interest but due to

some specific reason their interest has not been qualified, then the equity as a source may

divide their interest equally.


Equitable Remedies

Injunctions: It is a type of remedy in which the court provides the certain law and order

which the parties are pressured to do or abstain from doing a certain specific task.

Specific performance: In this type of remedy, the court passes a statement to the parties in

order to fulfil certain tasks which are interlinked or already a part of a contract.

Recession:  This remedy alternatively takes back the parties to their normal position as they

were in before entering the contract.

Rectification: In this type of remedy court orders to rectify or make certain changes in the

written document so that to reflect what is actually said on the first page.  


CONCLUSION

Equity plays a crucial role in the justice delivery system. In the world of digitalization, almost

every organism is now familiar with the technological part, wherein the computers are the

best replacement for humans nowadays mainly from the position of judge, ‘feed the fact and

laws into it and getting a judgement with all accuracy’.

The importance of equity was greater emphasis than the common law system. During the

centuries it gained importance and became an integral part of an Indian legal system too.

There are certain acts which work through the principle of equity nowadays in India.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services

  Empowering Businesses: Virtual Corporate Law Services In the dynamic world of business, legal support is crucial to ensure smooth operations, mitigate risks, and navigate regulatory landscapes. Lexis and Company offers Virtual Corporate Law Services to businesses in the UK, USA, Canada, Singapore, Dubai, and Australia , assisting with mergers, acquisitions, business contracts, compliance, and corporate governance. Key Features of Virtual Corporate Law Services 1. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Legal Support We provide comprehensive legal services for mergers and acquisitions , including due diligence, structuring deals, drafting agreements, and navigating regulatory approvals. Benefits: Ensures smooth and legally sound M&A transactions. Minimizes risks during corporate restructuring. Protects your business interests in high-value deals. Trending Hashtags: #MergersAndAcquisitions #BusinessDeals #CorporateLaw #LegalSupport #VirtualLegalExperts 2. Business Contracts and Ag...

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...

Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43

 Nathulal v. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1966 SC 43 CITATION AIR 1966 SC 43 COURT Supreme Court of India JUDGES/CORAM Justice K.S. Shah and Justice R. Bachawat DATE OF JUDGEMENT 22.03.1965 Facts: The facts of the case are as follows: The appellant was a dealer in a food grains at Dhar in Madhya Pradesh prosecuted in the Court of Additional District Magistrate for possessing in stock maunds and 21/4 seers of wheat for the purpose of sale without license. Subsequently appellant was charged for committing an offence under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Thereafter the appellant pleaded there was no intention to contravene any provisions of the law and the grains were stored upon filing an application for license and upon believe that it will be issued to him. The appellant further stated that he continued to submit returns on the food grains stored and purchased to the respected authority. Thus, the appellant was acquitted in the Court of Additional District Magistra...