Skip to main content

FEATURES OF RTI

 FEATURES OF RTI: 


Some distinctive aspects of RTI are : 


  • PUBLIC AUTHORITY: This act mandates the public authorities to keep clear and concise records of all the work undertaken by them as to make it easier for the general public to access and understand the records. All the records are expected to be in a digitalised manner so that there is a well connected network from which all the information can be acquired easily.

  • DESIGNATED OFFICERS: The officers appointed for the efficient functioning of the whole procedure are called Public Information Officer (PIO) who are appointed at both, state and central level. The citizens who wish to avail this right have to submit an application with the PIO who further transfers their application to the concerned department and retrieve the requested information within a reasonable amount of time. 


  • PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING INFORMATION: The procedure to request information is covered under Section 6 of the RTI.According to this, a person can file a request to obtain information from the POI of the concerned public authority in either digital or written form in English or Hindi without having to specify the reason for information sought by him or her.

  • TIME FRAME FOR TAKING THE REQUIRED ACTION AGAINST THE APPLICATION: This is covered under section 7 of the RTI, 2005. The concerned POI is expected to dispose off the application of RTI within 30 days after receiving the request. And if the solicited information is related to life and liberty of a person, the concerned POI is to take care of the application within 48 hours after receiving the request. The POI, when rejecting a request is supposed to provide the reason for the same. 


  • IMMUNITY FROM DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION: There are certain instances where the public authority is not compelled to provide information to any citizen such as when it endangers the sovereignty and integrity of the nation, when any court of law has explicitly forbidden it, when it endangers the life of any person etcetera. 

  • RETRIBUTION: When a POI does not discharge his duties properly by not entertaining an application or not endowing the required information within the prescribed time, the central information commissioner or state information commissioner have the authority to impose penalties on the concerned POI. 


  • FEES: The applicants requesting disclosure of information from any public authority are required to submit Rs.5 for examination of records for every hour except for the first hour which is free. People belonging to Below Poverty Line (BPL) are exempted from any fee provided that they submit a proof in support.

  • APPEAL: An applicant who has been denied the access to information can appeal an officer higher in rank than POI within thirty days of knowing about the non receipt of information. This is covered under section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. 



It is not uncommon to hear stories revolving around influential people engaging in corruption but RTI has enabled the general public to come forward with their concerns and raise the issues of law makers breaking the laws.To improve the current scenario, not only the government, but also people have to take charge and stop having the attitude of “Why should we partake in this? It does not affect us. “ Indian media has a huge role to play here as it can through its sources and power, influence people and make them aware of their rights and duties. This law stands as an example of citizensʼ courage and power being imperative in bringing the change in the higher levels of the government. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more