Skip to main content

Hearsay under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 by Mayurakshi Sarkar at Lexcliq

 Hearsay under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 by Mayurakshi Sarkar at Lexcliq

Introduction

The availability and acceptability of evidence are one of the most important aspects of a legal case. As defined herein, evidence is a "material item or claim of fact" that can be used in a court of law to establish the truth or falsity of any particular alleged fact being investigated or examined there. As a result, Evidence Law is an element of the legal climate that regulates the appropriate application of directives and proper application—regulating the demonstration of facts in a litigation process

Throughout the ages, this law has seen a dramatic shift in focus, focusing mostly on the admissibility and quality of evidence. A statute known as the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hence known as "the IEA"), governs the correct management of evidence in Indian courts and judicial proceedings.

Meaning of Hearsay Evidence

When a witness' testimony is based only on what he or she has overheard others say in the course of a conversation outside of court, the term "second-hand information" is used to describe their testimony. When compared to eyewitness testimony, hearsay has long been seen as a less reliable source of information.

Admissibility

Due to inconsistencies and fabrications, the person who provides testimony has no sense of responsibility and there is a risk of diluting the truth with each repetition. This type of evidence is generally not acceptable in proving a fact that has been said by a third party, as there is abundant opportunity to play fraud beneath the cover. Despite this, there are still a few exceptions to the rule.

Exceptions to hearsay evidence

"Hearsay evidence is no evidence," the saying goes. For legal purposes, there is no substitute for direct proof. However, there are a few notable exceptions to this generalization.

  1. Res Gestae- Res gestae, or 'the facts that are part of the same transaction,' is the meaning of the rule. Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act specifies this regulation. The testimony of a witness can be used to support a person's statements in court if the facts he states are part of the same transaction.

  2. Admission- Admission is an exception to the principle that hearsay isn't proof. Section 17 of the Indian Evidence Act identifies admission as an oral or written statement that infers a fact in an issue.

  3. Confession- Confession involves admitting guilt in court. The Indian Evidence Act makes no mention of confession. Sections 24-30 of the Indian Evidence Act deal with confessions. A person's extra-judicial confession can be proven by the person to whom it was made. However, he did not hear or see anything linked to the crime. But a person's confession can be proven by his testimony in court.

  4. Dying Declaration-  A person may be dying or disabled and hence unable to appear in court. In such instances, if the declarant makes a declaration to another person about his demise or cause of death, that person who received the statement may testify as a witness in court.

  5. Evidence given in former proceedings- If a witness dies or is unable to present for some reason, past comments made by the witness may be utilized to prove the truth in subsequent proceedings. Accounts and public registers such as official books can also be used as evidence in court. Even if the person is dead, past statements made in books or official registers are admissible in court.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more