Skip to main content

HISTORY OF RTI

 HISTORY OF RTI :


WHAT IS RTI? 

India is the largest democracy in the world. Democracy is a system of government where the leaders are elected by the people and for the people. To help this cause and make the Indian system more transparent and corruption free, the Indian government has taken a step in this direction by introducing the RTI Act, 2005. This has made India more accountable and interactive. This act replaced Freedom of Information Act, 2002. The RTI Act enables the citizens of India to access information from any government organisation regarding how and why a certain decision has been taken or implemented. This act empowers the general public to scrutinise the actions of the government as well as increase the accountability and protect their fundamental rights. 

The act includes the right to : 

  • Inspect works, documents and records 

  • Take notes, extracts or certified copied of documents or records 

  • Take certified samples of materials 

  • Obtain information through various modes 


HISTORY:
Concept of Right to Information started taking shape in 1970ʼs by liberal interpretation by the judiciary in various Fundamental Rights specially the right to freedom of speech and expression. In the case of Bennete Coleman and co versus Union of India in 1973, the majority opinion of the Supreme Court then put it “Freedom of speech and expression includes within it compass the right of all citizens to read and be informed”. 


Other significant cases such as State of UP vs Raj Narain, 1975, Manubhai Shah vs LIC, 1981 etcetera strengthened the stance of the Indian judiciary towards their support of a participatory democracy. 


Before its implementation, going to court was not a very efficient option for the common citizen as the whole process involved a lot of time and money which was not a feasible course of action for everyone. The first movement that revolutionised this act was led by Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan. It started as a local movement by the peasants against the local administration of villages regarding the development works and it gradually gained momentum and the changed the whole system. After this, various groups and individuals campaigned in favour of this right to become a part of Indiaʼs legislation. The UPA government, which was in power at that time appointed a National Advisory Council to suggest measures to modify the already existing Freedom of Information Act, 2002 and incorporate the demands of the people. The RTI bill, 2004 when tabled in the parliament was only applicable to the central government but various social movements took place which led the government to amend its state governmentsʼ administration policies as the stateʼs information was considered to be more useful to the general public. 


Coming to more recent times, an NGO called Parivartan, which encompasses people from different sectors, has been fighting for the public distribution system to be more transparent and to make the government more liable for its actions.It is working against corruption and the lack of governance prevailing in the country. 


After a long and taxing struggle of various activists such as Anna Hazare, BB Sharan and social organisations such as Nyayabhoomi ; Right To Information Act, 2005 has become a basic right and is now considered under the ambit of Right to speech and expression. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more