Skip to main content

Issues faced by Israel and Palestine and suggestion

 Issues faced by Israel and Palestine and suggestion

Israel is the only Jewish state in the world, and it is positioned just east of the Mediterranean Sea. Palestinians, the Arab population who descends from the land Israel currently occupies, refer to the territory as Palestine, and they wish to establish a state under that name on all or part of the same land that Israel currently governs. Both Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs desire the same piece of land. This is the underlying cause of the dispute. The status of Jerusalem is the first issue to be addressed. In the religions of Jews, Muslims, and Christians alike, Jerusalem is regarded as a sacred site. The eastern part of the country is dominated by Muslims, while the western part is dominated by Jews. The holy shrines are located in the heart of the city. Access to holy sites is restricted by Israel, which controls the city. Jerusalem has not been recognised as Israel's capital by the international community. Despite the fact that Israel recognises Jerusalem as its capital, the rest of the world considers Tel Aviv to be the official capital of Israel.

The Palestinian refugees are the second most important issue to address. Following the 1948 and 1967 wars, a large number of refugees fled to Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and other Arab countries, which took in the refugees. As a result of the conflict between ISIS and the Syrian government, the largest refugee camp in Damascus, Syria's capital, has become trapped. People who have already been displaced are being forced to relocate again. Terrorist activities and attacks on civilian targets are a source of concern for Israel.The military occupation of West Gaza by Israel is a source of concern for Palestinians in the region. The army has complete control over the West Bank. Gaza has been completely destroyed as a result of the blockade. It has deteriorated into one of the world's most impoverished regions. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are being encouraged by the provision of incentives. According to the United Nations, this is illegal. Israel on the other hand believes that any increase in population will automatically result in the establishment of a new state.

The West Bank Wall, which was built by Israel across the entire Palestine border, has severely restricted the ability of the Palestinian people to move freely.

Suggestions for resolving the conflict include the following:

A two-state solution should be considered, in which two independent countries are formed, one of which is Israel and the other which is Palestine. This was the recommendation made by the United Nations in 1947, but Israel did not take it into consideration.

Every political party must be able to recognise the legitimacy of the other's storey in order to cooperate.By engaging in dialogue, both parties should be able to find common ground.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree