Skip to main content

Lok Adalat

 Role of Lok Adalat in Dispute Resolution 

Lok Adalat, also known as People's court is a well-known system of alternative dispute resolution in India created under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Lok Adalat is inspired by the Panchayati Raj that has been prevalent in India and is based on the concept and principle of Panch Parmeshvar of the gram panchayats.

The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 which was enacted by the Parliament, gave a legal status to Lok Adalat, pursuant to the Constitutional mandate in Article39-A of the Constitution of India. The said act contains various provisions for resolving of disputes through Lok Adalat.

Thus, the age-old concept of Lok Adalat has, now, legal standing. It enables the Act to establish Legal Services Authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society so as to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are see that the same are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.[1] The first ever Lok Adalat was held in Gujarat in 1982.

Lok Adalat (individuals' courts) settles the dispute through assuagement and compromise. These Adalat consider the lawsuits pending within their reach, which may be resolved by conciliation, in the general courts. It is an exceptional type of tribunal in which conflicts between the parties are known by coordination of talks.[2] Permanent Lok Adalats are organised under section 22b of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and are set up as permanent bodies for resolution of disputes using conciliation and settlement.

Types of cases at Lok Adalat and its jurisdiction:

Lok Adalat deals with and have jurisdiction to determine all the cases that are pending before any court or the cases that have not been filed before any court. Such cases which have not been filed in any of the court are referred to the Lok Adalats when parties or a single party to the dispute visits the court or Lok Adalat for the referral of the case. The dispute can sometimes be also referred to the Lok Adalat when a party to the dispute submits an application in a pre-litigation dispute.

The cases which are generally dealt by Lok Adalat are related to compoundable criminal offences, land-acquisition disputes, matrimonial disputes, family disputes, land mutation etc.


Lok Adalats have no jurisdiction over any dispute or matter related to non-compoundable offences under any law and such cases shall remain out of purview of Lok Adalats.

Composition and organisation of Lok Adalat:

Members of Lok Adalat decide the pending cases of the Lok Adalat and play the role of statutory intermediaries and do not have any judicial role. Every Lok Adalat that has to be organised for a specific area shall consist of a chairman and two members. A sitting or a retired judicial officer shall be appointed as the chairman of a Lok Adalat and out of the other two members, one shall be a lawyer and another one shall be a social worker.

There are various levels at which Lok Adalats function.
The State Legal Service Authority consists of sitting or retired judge of the High Court or retired judicial officer. It also consists of either of the one or both legal professional and social worker.

The High Court Legal Services Committee constitutes benches of Lok Adalat with sitting or retired judge of High Court and either of the one or both legal professional and social worker.
The District Legal Services Authority would constitute benches of Lok Adalat with sitting or retired judicial officer and either of the one or both legal professional and social worker, ideally a woman.

The Taluk Legal Services Committee would constitute benches of Lok Adalat with sitting or retired judicial officer and either of the one or both legal professional and social worker, preferably a woman.

National level Lok Adalats take place at regular intervals and for the same purpose, Lok Adalats are held across the country, in the Supreme Court, High Courts, District courts and courts at a Taluk level, on a same day for the disposal of the cases in large numbers.

Powers of Lok Adalat:

Section 22 of The Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987 mentions the powers given to the Lok Adalats and they are same powers as are vested with the Civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 regarding various kinds of suits including production of documents, taking over any of the public documents or records from court etc.

Within section 22(2) of the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987, Lok Adalats are provided with the powers to define and set out their own policies and procedure for resolving all the disputes that are filed with them. All proceedings that take place before Lok Adalat are to be regarded as judicial proceedings as per Sections 193, 219 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Lok Adalat are same as civil court. Every award that is passed by the Lok Adalat is to be deemed as a decree of a civil court or other courts and binds the parties to the dispute.

Conclusion:
The characterization of the Permanent Lok Adalats as an ADR system has forever been referred to and much explanation hasn't been furnished regarding it. In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh, The Supreme Court held that such Lok Adalats just plays just a conciliary part and the award passed by the Lok Adalats doesn't mean and suggest any type of a free decision or an assessment inferred out of the dynamic interaction.

Resolution of disputes through the system of Lok Adalats in India is an Alternative dispute resolution which is blend of arbitration, negotiation, mediation and conciliation and has both adjudicatory and non- adjudicatory nature which puts forward as a replacement to the lengthy litigation process and makes it easier for the parties and prevents them from its multiplex and complex nature.

The 'Lok Adalat' is an old type of arbitrating framework that prevailed in India and its legitimacy has not been questioned even in modern India. As Indian courts are overburdened with numerous cases and matters, it takes years to settle such cases involving lengthy procedures and at that time Lok Adalats have always proven to be the best alternative dispute mechanism.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more