Skip to main content

M.C Mehta VS Union of India. 1984

 M.C Mehta VS Union of India. 1984 (Taj Mahal Case)

As we all know, the Taj Mahal is one of the world's wonders. It was built by Hindu labourers and artisans for Mughal ruler Shah Jahan. The Taj Mahal is India's pride, attracting thousands of tourists each year and contributing to the country's travel, tourism, and economy. The Mathura refinery generated a great deal of pollution due to a lack of adequate ventilation and a disregard for cleanliness and hygiene. They were utilising outdated equipment, which resulted in increased pollution. Acid rain is the effect of this pollution. Acid rain is a type of rain in which several toxic compounds, such as sulphur dioxide, are released when it is raining. Nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide were responsible for the Taj Mahal's colour loss. Taj Mahal was originally completely white in colour, but due to air pollution caused by Mathura refineries and acid rain, the white colour began to fade and the structure began to turn yellow, indicating that we are facing a major problem and that the public was also experiencing respiratory problems as a result of the air pollution. M.C Mehta initiates a public interest litigation against the Mathura refineries. The purpose of this suit is to halt contamination while enabling industry development. The conventional wisdom that events and nature cannot coexist is no longer adequate. Appropriate response is reasonable improvement. While industrial development is critical for the nation's economy, the climate and eco-system must be protected. The contamination created by improvement must be comparable to the carrying capacity of eco-frameworks. Barometric contamination in TTZ must be avoided at all costs. Not even a 1% chance may be taken when the preservation of an illustrious monument such as the Taj is at stake.

The Preparatory Standard was considered. The state administration and legal experts took specific climate measures in this rule. As this typical expectation indicates. Natural debasement occurs as a result of retaliation and violence. In the event of permanent and genuine harm. The absence of logical certainty should not be used to justify postponing efforts to avert ecological corruption. The polluter pays principle was defined in Vellore Residents Government Assistance v Association of India. As shown by this norm, the responsibility for climatic damage spreads toward reestablishing the ecological corruption as well as toward remunerating those responsible.

Three institutions were considered:

The 1974 Water (Prevention and Control of Contamination) Act ( the Water Act ).

The Air (Contamination Prevention and Control) Act, 1981 ( the Air Act ).

The Climate Security Act of 1986. ( the Climate Act ).

Article 21 of India's constitution guarantees life and individual liberty. Additionally. The constitution's articles 47, 48A, and 51A(g) stipulate that enhancing the expectation of universal well-being and ensuring shared environment. Regardless of the cautious guideline, natural measures should anticipate, avert, and combat the causes of ecological corruption. The Court issued a variety of orders. The Court created the Taj Trapezium, a ten-thousand-square-kilometer area shaped like a trapezium, to conduct air pollution control exercises. The Court considered the Varadarajan Advisory Group's recommendations. Among its few recommendations, it stated that equipped entities should conduct evaluations to determine the possibility of securing the Taj landmarks through measures such as the establishment of a green belt. Indeed, NEERI proposed in its report the establishment of a green belt around the Mathura processing plant.


Notably, this was the first time the Court envisaged a "green belt" as a feasible way of natural assurance. Businesses were urged to switch to environmentally friendly fuels and minimise their reliance on diesel generators, while the state was urged to continue developing the city's power supply. Tanneries based in Agra were asked about relocating from the Trapezium. The Contamination Control Sheets [State and Central] were tasked with monitoring any future deterioration in the quality of the air and reporting to the Court something very similar. Additionally, the Court requested that the public authority work on resolving various issues with the Taj's climate and white marbles, as well as undertaking clean-up chores. Taj was on the verge of obliteration and injury; the court recognised this disintegration on all sides. Additionally, the court recognised that such harm was caused by both conventional and non-traditional sources, as well as by other socioeconomic and financial factors. Numerous master authorities provided various studies stating that the air toxins caused by ventures have a detrimental effect on the Taj Mahal's marble. It is also affecting residents of the Taj trapezium zone. TTZ contamination must be reduced.

The court ordered that firms that are unable to obtain gas associations cease operations with the guidance of coke/coal in TTZ and may be forced to relocate. The Gas Authority Of India Restricted will complete the applications for gas associations (GAIL).

Additionally, the court stated that 292 Enterprises will transition to gaseous petrol as a modern fuel source. Additionally, the court granted particular rights and benefits to the labourers employed in these 292 Ventures. The workers will resume their duties in the new town and location where the business is relocated. The period between the conclusion of business in Agra and its restart at the point of relocation will be considered dynamic work for which the personnel will be compensated.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more