Skip to main content

Mergers & Acquisitions

 Mergers And Acquisitions- An Overview

Meaning Of M & A:

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals in which two or more companies merge in some way. Although the terms mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are sometimes used interchangeably, they have distinct legal meanings. Two companies of similar size merge to establish a new single entity.

An acquisition, on the other hand, occurs when a larger organization purchases a smaller company and absorbs its operations. Depending on the target company's board of directors' approval, M&A agreements can be friendly or hostile.


Types Of M & A Transactions:

Horizontal, vertical, concentric, and conglomerate mergers and acquisitions are examples of distinct types of mergers and acquisitions.

  1. Horizontal Merger
    When a company merges or acquires another company that delivers the same service or product to ultimate customers, this is known as a horizontal merger. Both businesses are in the same industry, serve the same clients, and are in the same stage of development.
     

  2. Vertical Merger:
    A vertical merger is similar to a horizontal merger, except that the companies are at different phases of production. A vertical merger would occur, for example, if a car manufacturer purchased a company that supplied seat belts for the cars. Both businesses are in the same industry, but they are at different stages of the manufacturing process.
     

  3. Concentric Merger:
    A concentric merger is another sort of M&A. This occurs when two businesses in the same industry have the same clients but offer distinct products and services. The products or services must complement one other for a merger to be termed concentric. A cell phone firm merging with a cell phone case company is an example of a concentric merger.
     

  4. Conglomerate Merger:
    A conglomerate merger occurs when two completely different businesses unite. This form of merger and acquisition is commonly used to grow into new industries.



M & A Example

Google and Android Acquisition - Google purchased Android for an estimated $50 million in 2005. Android was a relatively unknown mobile startup company at the time of the transaction. Google was now able to compete in a market dominated by Microsoft's Windows Mobile and Apple's iPhone.

As of May 2018, 54.5 percent of U.S. smartphone subscribers used a Google Android device, indicating that the acquisition was a success.


Reasons Behind M & A Activity

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can occur for a variety of reasons, including:

  1. Identifying and exploiting synergies:
    Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are commonly used to produce synergies that make the merged firm worth more than the two enterprises separately. Synergies might emerge as a result of cost-cutting or increased revenue. Cost synergies are achieved through economies of scale, whereas revenue synergies are achieved through cross-selling, expanding market share, or boosting prices. Cost synergies are the easier to quantify and calculate of the two.
     

  2. Increased growth:
    When opposed to organic growth, inorganic growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is usually a speedier technique for a firm to obtain bigger sales. Rather than risk creating those talents internally, a company can gain from acquiring or merging with a company that has cutting-edge capabilities.
     

  3. Increased market dominance:
    A horizontal merger will give a new organization a larger market share and the ability to influence prices. Vertical mergers also provide a company with more market power since it has more control over its supply chain and can avoid supply disruptions from other sources.
     

  4. The ability to diversify:
    Companies in cyclical industries feel compelled to diversify their cash flows to avoid severe losses during a downturn. By acquiring a target in a non-cyclical industry, a company can diversify and reduce market risk.
     

  5. Tax advantages:
    When one company has a lot of taxable income and another has a lot of tax loss carryforwards, the tax benefits are investigated. The acquirer can use the tax losses to reduce its tax liability by acquiring the company with the tax losses. Mergers, on the other hand, are rarely carried out only to save money on taxes.



Advantages Of M & A

Some of the advantages of M&A agreements are related to efficiencies, while others are related to capabilities, such as:

  1. Economies of scale have improved. Costs can be decreased, for example, by being able to purchase raw materials in larger quantities.

  2. Market share has increased. If the two businesses are in the same industry, pooling their resources could result in a higher market share.

  3. Distribution capacities have been improved. Companies may be able to expand their geographic service area or add to their distribution network by growing geographically.

  4. Labor costs are lower. Getting rid of redundant employees can help you save money.

  5. Talented workforce. Expanding the labor pool from which the new, larger company can draw can help the new, larger company grow and thrive.

  6. Financial resources have been increased. Two companies' financial resources are typically bigger than one company's alone, allowing for further investments.



Disadvantages Of M & A

Although mergers and acquisitions are costly endeavors, they can yield significant benefits.

There are also drawbacks, or reasons not to buy an acquisition, such as:

  1. Buying a firm comes with a lot of costs, especially if the company doesn't want to be bought

  2. Higher legal fees might be prohibitively expensive if a company refuses to be acquired.

  3. The expense of foregoing other agreements to concentrate on bringing two companies together.

  4. The probability of a negative reaction to a merger or acquisition, resulting in a drop in the stock price of the company.


Conclusion
Transactions involving mergers and acquisitions are becoming more common. M&A opens up doors that might otherwise be closed to you.

M&A is a common expansion strategy used by businesses to quickly expand their size, service area, talent pool, client base, and resources. However, because the procedure is pricey, firms must be certain that the benefit achieved is significant.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree