Skip to main content

Methods to Generate Black Money

 Methods to Generate Black Money:

Methods of Generating Black Money: The simplest method of generating black money is to avoid declaring or disclosing one's income or the activities that led to it. This is the most likely course of action in all cases involving criminal, unlawful, and improper activity. It is also possible to avoid declaring or reporting activities and the income earned as a result of these failures. This strategy can be used in circumstances of failure to comply with regulatory responsibilities or tax evasion on income generated through authorised operations. However, complete avoidance or non-compliance may put such incomes at risk of being discovered by authorities, with the resulting consequences being detrimental to the generator. The development of this type of black money, therefore, frequently involves a more complex method that involves the manipulation of financial records and accounting information. Tax evasion is the intentional misreporting or non-reporting of financial transactions in the books of account of a business.

In the following sections, we will discuss the various types of financial statement manipulations that result in tax evasion and the formation of black money:

Transactions that do not appear in the book

Books of Accounts that are kept in parallel

Accounting records are being manipulated.

Manipulation of sales / receipts is prohibited.

Production is under-reported by a large margin.

Expenses are being manipulated.

The use of international transactions to manipulate the market through the use of associate enterprises

Capital Manipulation is the act of manipulating money.

Manipulation of the stock of the closing company

Capital Expenses are being manipulated.

A number of them can be explained as follows:

Transactions that do not take place in a book:

This method is one of the simplest methods available, which is why it is so often utilised in practise. These businesses include modest grocery stores, unskilled or semi-skilled service providers, and other similar enterprises. Transactions that may result in receipts or income being subject to taxation are not recorded in the books of account by the taxpayer in this situation. The taxpayer either does not keep books of account or keeps two sets of books of account, or he or she merely reports partial receipts. Manipulation of Books of Account: Under the Companies Act, the Banking Regulation Act, and the Income Tax Act, books of accounts are needed to be maintained. It becomes increasingly difficult for tax payers to conduct out-of-book transactions or to keep parallel books of account as a result of this. Such individuals use the assistance of bookkeepers in order to avoid paying taxes.


Mocking the Balance of Payments: Mocking the balance of payments is possible by washing untraceable funds or by putting them into the books of accounts. Shares purchased at a premium, fictitious gifts and capital gains, the purchase of phoney losses, and other methods of manipulation are all possible. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree