Skip to main content

QUEEN V. TOLSON

 QUEEN V. TOLSON


The jury was found that at the time of the 2nd marriage she in good faith and on reasonable ground and on reasonable grounds believed her husband to be dead:-

By lord coleridge , C.J.huwkins, Stephen ,cave , A.L.smith , Wills Grantham  and Charles J.J. ( Denman , filed   and Manisty  afforded  a good  defense  to the indictment , and that the conviction  with wrong.

Case stated by Stephen, .J. and reserved by the court for the consideration of all the judges .

On the reasonable grounds, believed her husband to be dead and therefore remarried.

In fact he was still alive.  The court majority held that a BF belief in reasonable grounds as to the husband, a death was a defense to the charge of bigamy.

As Hawkins LJ. Said, it would be unfair to punish someone in the  total absence of fault.


Facts Of the Case:-

The appellant and defendant were married in September 1880. 

The appellant went missing as the ship he was in had got lost into the sea in December 1881.

The defendant waited for six years for her husband (the appellant) with the hope that he shall return.

Eventually, believing her husband to be dead, the defendant remarries. 

Eleven months later the appellant returned and on the knowledge of the remarriage of his wife (the defendant) he filed the appeal of bigamy against her.

Appellant’s contentions:-

 It was contended that the defendant had remarried and committed the offence of bigamy. 


Respondent’s contentions:-  

The respondent contended that she waited for six years and then remarried when her husband did not return without the intention of committing bigamy.


Judgement:- 

The appeal court said that despite the absence of words such as “knowingly committing bigamy” or “intentionally committing bigamy”, which would have excused her, Ms. Tolson was saved in this situation by an old common law rule. An “honest and reasonable belief” in the existence of circumstances that, if true, would make the accused’s acts innocent, was a proper defense, the court ruled.


Conclusion:-

An exemplary instance of an appeal court using the common law inventively to prevent a manifest injustice. Martha Tolson received word that her husband, who had deserted her, had been lost at sea during a voyage to America. Five years after she last saw him, believing him to be dead, she remarried. But her first husband later returned from the US very much alive and she was prosecuted for bigamy. Under Section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, which defined the crime, she did not have to have committed bigamy knowingly or intentionally for it to have been a crime. On the face of it, it was enough for a conviction for her to have remarried within seven years of her husband having deserted her. However, her conviction was quashed. The appeal court said that despite the absence of words such as “knowingly committing bigamy” or “intentionally committing bigamy”, which would have excused her, MsTolson was saved in this situation by an old common law rule. An “honest and reasonable belief” in the existence of circumstances that, if true, would make the accused’s acts innocent, was a proper defence, the court ruled.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti