Skip to main content

RAISING THE LEGAL MARRIAGE AGE FOR WOMEN

 RAISING THE LEGAL MARRIAGE AGE FOR WOMEN


Off lately, the Union Cabinet cleared a proposal to bring uniformity in the marriageable age

of men and women.

By amending the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006 and other personal law,

the legal age of marriage of women will be raised from 18 to 21 years.

In India, the minimum age of marriage was prescribed for the first time by the law known

as the Sarda Act, 1929. It was later renamed as the Child Marriage Restraint Act (CMRA),

1929.

In 1978, the law was amended to raise the minimum age of marriage to 18 years for girls

and 21 years for boys.

This position remains the same even in the new law called the Prohibition of Child

Marriages Act (PCMA), 2006, which replaced the CMRA ,1929.


MARRIAGE MINIMUM AGE FOR DIFFERENT RELIGIONS:


1. For Hindus, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 sets 18 years as the

minimum age for the bride and 21 years as the minimum age for

the groom.

2. In Islam, the marriage of a minor who has attained puberty is

considered valid.

3. The Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Prohibition of Child

Marriage Act, 2006 also prescribe 18 and 21 years as the

minimum age of consent for marriage for women and men,

respectively.

.


PROS OF RAISING MINIMUM AGE FOR MARRIAGE FOR WOMEN:

1. Women's and Children's Welfare: In terms of both her own malnutrition and that of her

kid, the mother's poverty plays by far the most important role. Early marriage and, as a

result, early pregnancies have an impact on mothers' and children's nutritional levels, as

well as their overall health and mental well-being.

2. Women's Empowerment And Gender Parity: A woman's educational level, living

conditions, health conditions, and decision-making capacity are all affected by her age at

childbearing.

3. Addressing Child Marriage: India has the world's highest number of underage marriages.

The law will aid in the prevention of child marriage.


CONS OF RAISING MINIMUM AGE FOR MARRIAGE FOR WOMEN

1. Difficulty in Fighting Child Marriage: The implementation of the child marriage law is

difficult.


4. The evidence suggests that when the law is used, it is mostly to

penalise young adults for self-arranged marriages.

5. The law to prevent child marriage does not work very well.

6. While child marriage has declined, it has been marginal: from

27% in 2015-16 to 23% in 2019-20, according to National Family

Health Survey (NFHS) 5.

7. 70% of early marriages take place in deprived communities such

as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and the law will

simply push these marriages underground instead of preventing

them.


2. Criminalisation of a Large Number of Marriages: The change will leave the vast

majority of Indian women who marry before they are 21 without the legal

protections that the institution of marriage otherwise provides, and make their

families criminalize.

3. Lack of Education is a Bigger Problem: According to the State of the World

Report 2020 by UNFPA, in India, 51% of young women with no education and

47% of those with only primary education had married by age 18.


CONCLUSION

Measures to curb child marriage

1. Improving Education: Activists believe that improving access to education is the key to

delaying child marriages, as the practise is both a social and economic issue. Skills and

business training, as well as sex education in schools, will be beneficial.


2. Improving School Access: The government should look at improving females' access to

schools and universities, as well as their transportation to these institutions from remote

places.


3. Mass Awareness Program: To raise public awareness of the rising age of marriage and to

foster social acceptance of the new legislation, a huge public awareness campaign is needed,

which they claim will be far more effective than coercive tactics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree