Skip to main content

Sexual harrasment at virtual workplace

 Topic : Sexual harassment in virtual workplace


Introduction

While physical and verbal sexual harassment are frequently motivated by the harasser's desire to dominate or intimidate the victim, online sexual harassment can be motivated by a variety of factors. It's common to use revealing images or sexual information (whether real or not) to embarrass the victim. Some harassers may know the victim personally, have been rejected in person, and are now taking revenge online. Virtual sexual harassment, on the other hand, has the potential to escalate out of control.


"The lack of a tangible relationship between the attacker and the victim makes it easier to say things one wouldn't say in person," the authors write in Shame Nation: The Global Epidemic of Online Hate. For example, one employee who wants to ask another for a date but is reluctant to do so may instead write a sexually provocative email to avoid having to confront their coworker in person.


Furthermore, when a harasser writes something publicly, other harassers, even if they don't know the victim, may throw gasoline to the fire. Why? The authors point out that "online posters may not know exactly who the victims are or regard them as genuine individuals," and that "there is always the possibility to bounce off the debate at any time."


While "conventional" sexual harassment often featured a single harasser and one or more victims, internet sexual harassment might entail several harassers ganging up on a single victim.


How to Avoid Online Sexual Harassment

Because virtual sexual harassment occurs online rather than in public, it might be difficult to identify. There are, however, measures to safeguard your personnel.


To begin, demonstrate your company's commitment to a harassment-free workplace. Create a comprehensive sexual harassment policy that includes online conduct. Ensure that the policy is followed at all times. Encourage your staff to share their ideas on how to make your workplace safer from virtual sexual harassment.

Because virtual sexual harassment occurs online rather than in public, it might be difficult to identify. There are, however, measures to safeguard your personnel.


To begin, demonstrate your company's commitment to a harassment-free workplace. Create a comprehensive sexual harassment policy that includes online conduct. Ensure that the policy is followed at all times. Encourage your staff to share their ideas on how to make your workplace safer from virtual sexual harassment.


Updating Your Sexual Harassment Training


Examine your company's current anti-harassment policies and training. Do they cover online sexual harassment as well? Make changes to the policy and distribute it to all staff.


Then, educate staff on what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable digital behaviour. Teach them how to recognise online sexual harassment and how to report it on their own or a coworker's behalf.


Role-playing exercises could also be included to help employees learn how to avoid bullying their coworkers online. Shorter, more frequent sessions with interactive aspects are preferable than extensive lectures.

Furthermore, teach personnel in small groups, with distinct sessions for supervisors and employees. Information on how to protect themselves, their colleagues, and the business from the repercussions of virtual sexual harassment should be included in management training. Allow participants to provide comments and ask questions during employee seminars. More individual attention aids their understanding of the anti-harassment message.


Although the United States has a federal cyber-stalking legislation that covers online harassment, several states, such as California, Illinois, and Massachusetts, have their own laws. Create a training programme that reflects the laws' definitions of virtual sexual harassment and its implications.


Online harassment may be harder to detect, yet it is just as harmful as physical harassment. Ascertain that your company has the necessary processes and training in place to tackle it.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
2 comments
Read more

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting
5 comments
Read more