Skip to main content

Single Parenting

 Single parenting has always been a different task in Indian society. And lockdown has worsened the

conditions that made single parents even more vulnerable. It is often not acceptable in Indian society as

people often consider single parents as non-capable of raising children. Though children raised by single

parenting can be as normal, healthy, and cheerful as children living with two parents.


It is often believed that single parenting has a negative effect on children but this is not at all true as a

good single parent is better than two parents who create a toxic atmosphere for their child. Single

parenting takes a little more effort and the environment of lockdown affected single parents negatively

as it was now a difficult task to manage both home chores and professional work along with the

responsibility of their children.

Social norms

The myth and stereotype thinking of people have adversely affected the lives of single parents.

It’s not acceptable if a child is raised by a single parent. They are often forced to get married to get

another partner so as to upbring the child properly.

Though this sometimes results in a toxic relationship and can even worse the child’s upbringing. Societal

norms often lead to the suppression of weaker gender and might negatively affect the child.


Who are the single parents?

Single parents are those who live with their child or children and those who don’t have any spouse or

live-in-partners.’


And the reason behind becoming a single parent is divorce, domestic violence, rape, death of another

partner, single personal adoption. And divorce, domestic violence, are cruel factors and for those who

are become single parents, these factors are not that much easy to spend a peaceful life. There are

many hurdles between their life race such as unhappy marriages and thus for divorce rate are inclining.

The education gap in single motherhood

The widening educational gaps in single motherhood have led to widespread concerns about its

implications for social inequality. Single mothers and their children face elevated poverty and other

wellbeing risks, and growing up in a single-mother family can lead to lower educational attainment and

psychological wellbeing in adulthood. Poverty risks and other adverse outcomes can be particularly

prominent among single mothers with low education.


These mothers are often doubly disadvantaged in the labour market, as their employment situation is

restricted by not only their low education but also the challenges of combining paid work with family

responsibilities. Low education and a weak employment situation combined with inadequate policies


can create the ‘triple bind’ that hampers single mother households’ wellbeing. And this is not easy to

hand for any single mother to deal with that much mental and physical stigma.


Impact on the child

Living in a single-parent family is strongly correlated with school failure, delinquency, drugs use, teenage

pregnancies, poverty and welfare dependency.


As the Emma Fransson et al. statics shows the performance of single parents families is poor. Their

physical health, behaviour mental health, peer friendship, cultural activities, sports and family

relationships, compared to children from intact families.

The child experiences the breakdown in family structure shows poor behaviour outcomes and high

psychological disorder. And as many times in single parenting families, the child has to decide without

consulting their parents, and because of their decision are reflects on their choices of right and wrong.


Conclusion

This is a myth that a single parent especially a single mother can’t upbring a child properly. But now

single mother’s have come up with proving society’s stereotypical thinking wrong. They have proved

that a child raised by a single parent especially mothers can raise their children with utmost happiness,

unaffected mental health and a healthy lifestyle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree