Skip to main content

State legislations on online gambling

 State legislations on online gambling


Different states have enacted legislation that distinguishes between a game of skill and a game of

chance. There are some states that prohibit both a game of chance and a game of skill if they are

conducted for monetary gain. As an illustration, consider the recent Tamil Nadu state legislation on

online gambling, which was met with widespread opposition from the gaming community and

ultimately struck down by the High Court of Madras. To amend the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police

Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020 (Amendment) the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws (Amendment)

Act, 2020 was passed. The Amendment was specifically written to prohibit games of skill when they

are played for wagers, bets, money, or other stakes, as defined by the Constitution. The High Court

of Madras upheld the constitutionality of this amendment. According to the court, certain provisions

of the Amendment were unconstitutional.

For starters, the court ruled that games of skill are considered business activities under Article

19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution and are therefore protected. As a result, it was determined that

games of skill could not be prohibited. As a second point of contention, the court determined that

certain prohibitions contained in the Amendment are not proportionate to the purpose of the

Amendment. The court determined that the state's intent was only to prohibit gambling in games of

chance, and not in games of skill, and that the state's intent was to prohibit gambling in games of

skill. Therefore, the Amendment is unreasonably burdensome and disproportionate to the situation.

To summarise: The Supreme Court determined that states have authority to enact laws on betting

and gambling that are limited to games of chance and not those requiring skill. As a result, the

Amendment was deemed unconstitutional by the court.

Despite this, the state of Karnataka recently passed a law along the same lines. It was passed to

amend the Karnataka Police (Amendment) Act, 1963, which was previously passed in the year 2000.

The said Act makes all forms of gambling, including online gaming, a cognizable and non-bailable

offence, and it applies to all jurisdictions. Essentially, all games, including skill games, would be

prohibited if they were played for a prize or for monetary compensation. This was not well received

by the gaming community as a result of this. With the exception of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, the

states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have banned online games, which include games of skill,

even if they are played for monetary compensation or reward. However, while most of the states

listed above forbid any form of gambling, including skill-based games for money, there are a few

states that have legalised them and have put in place proper regulations for online gambling. After

passing the Sikkim Online Gaming (Regulation Act, 2008) and the Sikkim Online Gaming (Regulation

Rules, 2009), the state of Sikkim became the first in the country to legalise online gambling. In

accordance with said Act, "online games" include any and all forms of entertainment including

games of chance, which are prohibited in the majority of other jurisdictions. Applications for the

operation of online games and sports games in Sikkim are granted licences by the state government

for a period of five years. People from other states, on the other hand, will be unable to access such

games through websites. This type of licenced online games and sports games is restricted to the

physical premises of the gaming parlour, which must be located within the boundaries of Sikkim

state. On January 1, 2020, the state of Meghalaya passed the Meghalaya Regulation of Gaming Act,

2021, which sought to regulate the online gaming industry in its jurisdiction. It governs both a skill-

based and a chance-based game of chance. The state of Meghalaya grants licences to applicants for

a period of five years after they submit an application. The Licensees are required to pay a "gaming

royalty," which is a percentage of the amount of money earned after deducting prize money

deductions and other expenses and charges from the total amount of money earned.


The state of Nagaland, in contrast to the states of Sikkim and Meghalaya, has only legalised online

gambling games based on skill, with every game of chance being outlawed. In order to regulate

online games of skill, the Nagaland Prohibition of Gambling and Promotion and Regulation of Online

Games of Skill Act, 2015 was enacted. Under this Act, licences are issued to entities that offer games

of skill on their platforms, and the act is currently in effect. Being able to regulate online gambling

with such clarity eliminates the need for a black market for online gambling websites to operate. It is

necessary for the federal government to draw inspiration from these state laws in order to regulate

online gambling uniformly across all states and to avoid ambiguity in the interpretation and

enforcement of the laws. Every now and then, discussions about regulating online gambling take

place in the Parliament, such as the one that took place last week in the Rajya Sabha. Shashi

Tharoor, an Indian politician who currently serves as a Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha, took

the initiative to address the issue of regulating online gambling in 2018. In 2018, he introduced a

private bill in relation to online gambling that was passed by the Lok Sabha. Despite this, such

discussions and attempts have proven to be fruitless.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more