Skip to main content

Study of Ombudsman in India by Mayurakshi sarkar at lexciq

 Study of Ombudsman in India

Introduction

After independence setting up of a democratic system of government raised tremendous

hopes and high expectations amongst people. People sought for quick and satisfactory

redressal of their grievances. The committee on ‘Prevention of corruption’ (Santhanam

Committee) in its report gave special attention to create machinery in the government which

can provide quick and satisfactory redress to public grievances. The concept of ombudsman

first originated in Sweden in the year 1809 by King Charles XII. It was also practiced by

Finland in 1919, Denmark in 1953, Norway in 1963, New Zealand in 1962, US 1960 and in

UK 1967. Ombudsman is an appointed official whose duty is to investigate complaints,

generally on behalf of individuals such as consumers or taxpayers, against Institutions such as

companies and government departments. The literal meaning of Ombudsman is ‘grievance

man’ or a ‘commissioner of administration.’  According to Garner, he is an officer of

parliament having as his primary function, the duty of acting as an agent for the parliament

for the purpose of safeguarding the citizen against abuse or misuse of administrative power

by the executive.


Judges, lawyers, and other officials are qualified to be an ombudsman. He is appointed by the

parliament; the parliament does not interfere with the functions of an ombudsman.

Ombudsman can make suggestions or recommendations for changes in the administrative law

for higher transparency, efficiency, and justice.


MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF OMBUDSMAN

Some of the major and important characteristics of ombudsman are listed as follows-


 The ombudsman is an independent and non-partisan officer of the legislative who

supervises the administration.

 The ombudsman does not serve as an advocate for a particular person (student,

faculty, or staff).

 It is a body that assists with fair and prompt resolution of complaints in an unbiassed,

confidential, and independent manner.


 It is normatively universalistic.

 Popularly accessible and visible.

 Consists of extensive resources to conduct his mission.

 It is established as a separate entity that is autonomous in function.

 An ombudsman has the power to investigate, criticise and report back to the

legislature but does not reserve administrative actions.


OMBUDSMAN IN INDIA


The idea of ombudsman was first talked in our country by Mr. K.M. Munshim. But the main

credit goes to Sri M.C Setalvad. In all India Lawyers’ Conference held in 1962, Sri M.C

Setalvad urged the participants to undertake a study about the feasibility of ombudsman in

India. He proposed an idea for establishing an institution as that of ombudsman. It was then

spoken by Dr L.M Singhvi, M.P, who raised the issue for setting up of an office of

ombudsman in emphatic terms and also campaigned for it in the parliament. In 1963, Mr P.B

Gajendragadkar, the then chief justice of the Supreme Court of India made a strong plea for

its adoption in India.


In 1966, the Administrative Reforms Commission recommended the office of Lokpal similar

to that of an ombudsman. On the basis of the recommendation made by the commission, the

Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill was placed in the parliament in the year 1969.


The Administrative Reforms Commission formulated the following principles recommending

the office of Lokpal-


 Lokpal should be demonstrably independent and impartial.


 The investigations and the proceedings should be conducted in private and should be

informal in character.


 His appointment should be non-political.


 He should deal with the matters involving acts of injustice and corruption.


DISADVANTAGES OF OMBUDSMAN

In spite of having various advantages, there are some arguments against setting up of the

office of the Ombudsman.


 Cannot provide a quick solution to complex problems

 Decisions are not binding

 It is said that this institution may be successful in the countries with low population,

but countries with large population like India with their large complaints it may be

difficult for a single man to solve all those problems.

 In India, this institution is not suitable. It is an impractical and disastrous experiment

which will not fit into the Constitution.


CONCLUSION


In order to make sure that a nation should prosper it becomes very important that the

administrative wing of the nation is functioning properly and efficiently and to check that

there is no corruption in the administrative department of the nation. Corruption is actually

the deep-rooted cause which is the biggest obstacle in the development of a nation. In order

to tackle this problem of corruption the institution of ombudsman plays the most important

role and in the Indian context this role is played by the Lokpal. But Ombudsman is not a

‘magic potion for all the evils of bureaucracy.’ His success depends upon the existence of a

reasonable well-administered state. He cannot cope with the situation where administration is

riddled with backing and corruption. Thus, it’s a great system of control for the country

which has less population and good working government but in the country like India with

this large population it is not that effective for check in administration.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more