Skip to main content

Supreme Court of India (Advocate)

 We have an in-house team of highly qualified, proactive and diligent Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India for all types of specialized legal services in the Supreme Court of India including online legal services for quick and easy solutions at nominal costs:

Filing and defending of SLP civil by Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India against order of the High Court or Tribunal.

For filing of SLP criminal by Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India.

Filing of Bails before Supreme Court of India by Advocate for Supreme Court of India.

Handling of Transfer petition civil for transfer of civil case from one state to another by expert and highly qualified Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India.

Transfer petition criminal for transfer of criminal case from one state to another state by team of best Supreme Court Lawyers in India.

Writ Petition ( Civil ) under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by expert Supreme Court lawyer.

Writ Petition ( Criminal ) against any atrocity of police or law enforcing authorities

PIL & pro bono litigation by expert Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India.

Appeals under Article 132 of the Constitution of India, against a judgment, decree or final order of a High Court, whether in civil, criminal or any other proceedings, if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India by Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India.


Appeals under Article 133 of the Constitution of India, from a judgment, decree or final order of a High Court, from a civil proceedings of a High Court, if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance and in its opinion the said question of law need to be decided by the Supreme Court of India.For Appeals under Article 132 of the Constitution of India, from a judgment, final order or sentence in criminal proceedings of a High Court if:

It has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to death or

Has withdrawn for trial before itself, any case from any court subordinate to it and has in such trial convicted the accused and sentenced him to death or

It certifies that the case of a fit one for appeal to the advocate for Supreme Court of India.

For Appeal by Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution of India for grant of special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order in any case of matter passed or made by any Court or tribunal in the territory of India except the Court of tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to armed forces by Supreme Court Advocate Delhi India.

For Criminal Appeals under Section 379 of CrPC read with Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 as amended by Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Amendment Act, 1972 from any judgment, final order or sentence in a criminal proceedings of a High Court, if the High Court has:

On appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for a period of not less than ten year;

Has withdrawn from trial before itself any case from any Court subordinate to its authority and has in such trial convicted the accused person and sentenced him to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for a period of not less than ten years.


For Appeals Section 130 E of the Customs Act, 1962 from any judgment of the High Court on a reference made under Section 130, where the High Court certifies it to be a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court or any order passed by the Appellate Tribunal relating, amongst other things, to the determination of any question having relation to the rate of custom duty or the value of goods for the purpose of assessment.

 

For Appeal under Section 35 L of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 from any judgment of the High Court delivered on a reference made under Section 35 G, in which the High Court certifies to be a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court, or any order passed by the Appellate Tribunal relating, amongst other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purpose of assessment.

 For Appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from an order made by the National Commission, entertaining complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any claimed exceeds Rupees One Crore.

 

For Appeal under Section 19(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts of Act, 1971, from any order or decision of Division Bench of a High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction to punish for contempt.

 

For Appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 from an order made by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India under Section 36 and 37 of the Advocates Act.

 

For Appeal under Section 116 A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 on any question, whether of law or fact, from every order passed by a High Court under Section 98 or Section 99 of the said Act.

 

For Appeal under Section 10 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 from any judgment, sentence or order not being an interlocutory order, of the special court, both on fact and on law.

How to approach advocate for supreme court of India?

Supreme Court of India can be approached against the orders of the High Court or tribunals generally but a Writ under Article 32 can be directly filed.


Can online petition be filed before Supreme Court of India?

No, there is no provision for an online petition. We provide online legal services for filing a petition before the Supreme Court of India.


Who is the best lawyer for Supreme Court?

There are several good lawyers for the Supreme Court of India based on the field of specialization.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske
1 comment
Read more

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree
Post a Comment
Read more