Skip to main content

Uniform Civil Code a dream or reality?

                    Uniform Civil Code a dream or reality?

 

India is a unique country not only in terms of geography but also in terms of its social scenario. It is also a land of various cultures and different religions. The Indian culture believes in Unity in Diversity but unfortunately this Unity in Diversity has not helped to bring political unity in India.

         Family law in India is predominantly based upon the religious personal laws of several different communities which exist therein. The laws coming under the umbrella of religious personal laws governing family relations themselves are an amalgamation of customary laws which are interpreted by the courts and the codified personal laws which the legislatures have enacted. The application of personal laws to the respective communities is seen as an essential part of their religion and inherent in their freedom to practice and propagate their religion.

      Though India achieved Independence in 1947, it was done at the cost of partition of the country. For the framers of Constitution, the unity and integrity of the country was the primary consideration. 

The Constitution Sates that:

We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic and to secure to all its citizens, in order to provide Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.

         For achieving all these ideals, the concept of fundamental rights and directive principles were framed in Chapter III and IV respectively in the Constitution of India. The framers of the Constitution of India adopted a unique federal system possessing a strong centre. They thought that Uniform Civil Code will be an important means to achieve National Integration. Hence the framers of our Constitution have recommended for a UCC.

        The feminist thinkers always believed that personal laws are an important source for their exploitation and hence they should be abolished and a UCC should be adopted. They believed UCC was a means to achieve gender justice. The Constitution of India guarantees freedom to practice any religion. The Constitution draws a balance between secularism and religious freedom.

         The word Secularism was inserted in Constitution of India in 1976 after the case of S.R Bommai  V. Union Of India. After the Bommai case it was held that Secularism is the basic feature of Indian Constitution. The concept of Secularism is based on Sarva – Dharma –  Sambhava i.e. equal respect for all religions. But the concept of Secularism has not been able to achieve the Constitutional goal of Fraternity i.e. – “We The People Of India”.

 

There is a need for codification for the achievement of the constitutional objectives. Codification can also be a means of legal reform. The codification of criminal and commercial laws was done by the Britishers. Since they believed in the policy of divide and rule therefore they did not make any effort  to codify personal laws and the same policy was followed by the Indian rulers.

         There are different codes for different communities like Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, Hindu Guardianship Act. Muslims and Christians are governed by their personal laws. There are also many different sects and they are ruled by their customs, traditions etc. These codes are based on different personal laws of different religious communities, but this classification based on religion faces various difficulties, whenever the question arises on matter of succession, marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, maintenance, guardianship, custody of children etc.

       There is difficulty in distribution of justice, hence decisive steps were taken towards national consolidation in form of idea of Uniform Civil Code which was for the first time mooted seriously in the Constituent Assembly in 1947.

        The Uniform Civil Code as envisaged in Art. 44 of the Indian Constitution covers almost the entire ambit of family laws. We have a Uniform Civil Code for almost all the laws except for matrimonial and religious laws. There is no Uniform Civil Code of Law applicable to the marital relation of all, irrespective of ethnic or religious affiliations.

         While drafting Article 44 of the Constitution, one member Shri Mahboob Ali Beg Bahadur, was opposed to the idea of civil code, saying that “Civil Code” strictly does not cover personal laws of citizens. The civil code should only contain law relating to property, Contract, Evidence, etc.

Constraints in the enactment of UCC

India has made attempts since Independence in formulating a UCC for all religions. But due to difficulties and objections it could not be achieved.

  • Lack Of Information

The information as well as knowledge about its origin and history plays a very crucial role in formulation of any law or code. The history of law reform in general and process of codification in particular reveals that in India the Criminal and Commercial Laws were codified by collecting and processing information of many legal system.

  • No build-up of public opinion

The people were not aware about the pros and cons of UCC and hence they were not in a position to give their opinion on the issue.

  • No Draft Bill

For formulating any law there has to be a draft bill on the proposed law. For preparing a draft bill no information was available. Hence UCC could not be formulated.

 

I would like to say that citizens belonging to different religious and denominations follow different property and matrimonial laws which is not only affront to the nation’s unity, but also makes one wonder whether we are sovereign secular republic or loose confederation of feudal states, where people live at the whims and fancies of mullahs, bishops and pundits. 

            A common Civil Code will help the cause of national Integration by removing disparities in laws which have conflicting ideologies. A State is responsible and is charged with duty of securing a UCC for its citizens.

           UCC also aims at providing equal status for men and women and protection of dignity of women. UCC can bring uniformity to India. The conflicting and ambiguous personal laws have brought many ills in the Indian Society and only a UCC can provide effecting cure. UCC may bring uniformity in India.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Effects of Non-Registration

 Effects of Non-Registration The Companies Act, 2013 evidently highlights that the main essential for any organization to turn into a company is to get itself registered. A company cannot come into existence until it gets registered. But no such obligation has been imposed for firms by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. If a firm is not registered it does not cease to be called as a firm, it still exists in the eyes law. Certainly, such a big advantage is not absolute but is subjected to a lot of limitations which we will study further. Non-registration of a firm simply means that the business skips the formalities of incorporation and ceases to exist in the eyes of the law. section 58 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with the procedure of incorporation. Likewise, the meaning of non-registration is the exact opposite of registration, meaning when a firm does not go through the procedure of incorporation or start carrying on activities without getting registered. Effects of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur ...
1 comment
Read more

Concept of constitutionalism

  Concept of constitutionalism Who Started Constitutionalism? John Locke - The English Bill of Rights is a foundational constitutional document that helped inspire the American Bill of Rights. Political theorist  John Locke  played a huge role in cementing the philosophy of constitutionalism.  Constitution is a written law which describes the structure of Government, the rules according to which the Govt. must work and the boundaries within which the Govt. must work. Constitutionalism   can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules. Constitution constitution is the document that contains the basic and fundamental law of the nation, setting out the organization of the government and the principles of the society. Basic norm (or law) of the state; System of integration and organi...
Post a Comment
Read more