Skip to main content

Vicarious Liability by Mayurakshi Sarkar at Lexcliq

 Vicarious Liability

-Mayurakshi Sarkar

In most cases, a person is only liable for his own conduct; but, a person can be held liable for the wrongs of others in certain circumstances. This is known as "vicarious responsibility," which means that someone else is responsible for their actions. According to SALMOND, "In general, a person is liable exclusively for his actions, but there are extraordinary instances in which the law imposes on him vicarious liability for the acts of another, however blameless himself." Master accountability for the misdeeds of his servants is the most typical occurrence. In certain instances, both joint and multiple liability apply. It is possible for a plaintiff to sue both the actual wrong-doer and his or her employer.

Based on these two maxims, a vicarious liability law can be summarised as follows:

(a) Qui facit per alium facit per se : In legal parlance, the maxim states that "he who acts through another is seen as acting on his own." This notion was also the source of the master's accountability for the actions of his servants. The reason for this is that any individual who assigns someone to perform a certain type of task in his absence has to trust him to do so in accordance with the circumstances at hand. If an employee commits an act of dishonesty, the employer is responsible for it, even if it was done out of the employee's own free will, as long as it was done in the course of the employee's work and was not an act of personal whim.

(b) Respondeat superior: Maxim "let the master answer" is translated as "the superior must bear the responsibility or let the principal bear the responsibility," and it signifies that either the superior must bear the responsibility or he or she must bear it. In such instances, both the one who follows and the one who orders are held responsible. Legal presumption that all acts done by the servant in and around his master's business are done by his master's express or implied authority and are in actuality the act of the master is the basis for this rule. The master is put in the same position as though he had performed the act personally. A servant's actions are the responsibility of the master, even if there is no evidence of an express command or privity. A principal and his or her agent are both accountable as joint wrongdoers if the latter commits a crime approved by the former.

In these decisions, the Supreme Court ruled:

In Mohammad v. WM Morrison Supermarket, WM Morrison Supermarkets was involved in a case involving a gas station customer who was subjected to verbal and physical abuse at the hands of a Morrison grocery staff. He was identified as Mr. Khan. Mr Mohammad was taken by Mr Khan to the back of the petrol station, where he was beaten and kicked to the ground by Mr Khan. When his supervisor tries to stop Mr Khan, he ignores his instructions. At first, no one held him accountable. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that Morrison should be held accountable for Mr. Khan's activities since they were so closely tied to his employment.

For example, in the case of Cox v. Ministry of Justice, a prisoner dropped a sack of rice on the catering manager, inflicting injuries to his back. People wanted to know if his activities were sanctioned by the Ministry of Justice. The country's court ruled that MOJ is not vicariously liable because they do not have an employment relationship. The top court ruled that it didn't matter whether the prison wasn't engaged in any commercial operations, as long as he was receiving some type of compensation from the Ministry of Justice. Despite the fact that there is no financial reward. As a result, the Supreme Court held the Ministry of Justice accountable for the prisoner's actions.


Popular posts from this blog

INCOME TAX SECTION 32AD - Investment in new plant or machinery in notified backward areas in certain States

 Description (1) Where an assessee, sets up an undertaking or enterprise for manufacture or production of any article or thing, on or after the 1st day of April, 2015 in any backward area notified by the Central Government in this behalf, in the State of Andhra Pradesh or in the State of Bihar or in the State of Telangana or in the State of West Bengal, and acquires and installs any new asset for the purposes of the said undertaking or enterprise during the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 2015 and ending before the 1st day of April, 2020 in the said backward area, then, there shall be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to fifteen per cent of the actual cost of such new asset for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such new asset is installed. (2) If any new asset acquired and installed by the assessee is sold or otherwise transferred, except in connection with the amalgamation or demerger or re-organisation of business referred to in clause (xiii)or cla

60 Minute Marriage Counselling Session On Phone

Description A 60 minute phone call with an expert Marriage\Relationship Counselor to discuss your marriage\relationship related issues. Counselling aims to resolve issues and improve communication in a relationship. Couples’ counselling works with both people in the relationship, however sessions can start with one individual, working towards the involvement of the other partner. What's Included a) 60 minute phone call with the counselor where you can discuss all your issues and seek guidance. What's Not Included a) Counselling session via meeting

Send Legal Notice for Divorce

 India being a secular country derives a large part of its laws from various religious practices. One such area of law is Divorce law of India. A divorce case in India can be initiated by either party based on the procedure relevant as per the law applicable to the parties. However, the procedure for divorce always starts with sending a legal notice.   Either party can send a legal notice to the other spouse intimating his/her intent to initiate legal proceedings for divorce. Sending a legal notice acts as a formal way of communication by one party to the other acting as a warning and at the same time creating chances for a last attempt for conciliation, if possible. Connect with an expert lawyer for your legal issue   What is a legal notice for divorce? A legal notice refers to a formal communication to a person or the opposite party in a case, informing him/her about one’s intention to undertake legal proceedings against him/her. Therefore, a legal notice for divorce is a formal inti