Skip to main content

Violence against doctors

 Violence Against Doctors: Where Are We Heading?


"Every time a doctor is assaulted, another 100 doctors stop taking the risk they would usually take to

save someone. Unfortunately, your loved one will bear the price of it and you wouldn't even know"

Introduction

Last few years, reports of violence against doctors, generally resulting in grievous murder or hurt,

are creating headlines across the world. Many such incidences are reported from India. But, this

menace has not been highlighted adequately. Whether or not the rise In coverage of violence

actually represents a true increase in the prevalence of the condition or simply represents increased

awareness within the era of electronic mass media and improved mass media equipment desires

additional assessment.

Violence against doctors or different medical fraternity hardly created any news, or hardly there was

discussion about this in India in medical journals a couple of decade back as they were most likely

infrequent .Very often, those that abused a medical person were patients themselves who were

beneath the influence of alcohol and drug and were delirious or were in the psychiatry wards.

Increased risk of violence was conjointly recorded once a general physician was on house calls,

particularly at night.

However violence in India, particularly against the doctors, gives a totally different picture. More

often than not in India, patients by themselves aren't violence makers, but their relatives are. These

unknown apparently sympathetic people political leaders and political parties take the law in their

hand. The most vital dimensions of violence to the doctors in corporate and government hospitals is

the feeling of wrong doing by the doctors for money or for avoiding his/her duties.


Anxiety, long waiting period before the patient may speak to a doctor and therefore the feeling that

doctor isn't giving enough attention to his/her patients engender frustration giving rise to violence.

Majority of the hospitals in India don't have a good grievance addressal system in place. Legal

procedure in India however takes extraordinarily long time.

For government hospitals and first health centers across the country, significantly in West Bengal

and Maharashtra, violence by patients' relatives, local goons, political leaders and even by police has

been reported. Here, money isn't the solution , the anxiety, long waiting period, non-availability of

crucial investigations, unreasonable delay in referral, unhygienic and intensely crowded condition

within the emergency and different wards are a number of reasons given. Electronic and mass media

both don't have real understanding of the challenges faced by the

Doctors. Factors related to violence against doctors in India. Now, what may be done to scale back

the violence against doctors? If we glance at the classification of patient violence, in our country,

most of the time, the violence refers to verbal abuse, devastation and physical threat; most of the

types of violence

Are to return to our society. However, the most important difference in violence as is seen in

western

Countries is quickly the verbal abuse becomes physical assault and vandalism and how rare it's


That the patients and their relatives or third party make no efforts to prevent it. Several

prescriptions for preventing violence to doctors have been provided within the literature ranging

from changing the program of study, developing additional communication skills, understanding by

taking note of patients who can be violent, being cautious at violent venues, ready to run from the

scene if scenario demands, educating patients and their relatives, rising attention, etc. While some

of these prescriptions are implementable, some are clearly not.


What A Doctor Can Do Or Should Do To Avoid Violence?

A doctor ought to perceive a number of those patient related characteristics which can be related to

violence. Whereas most of the things are related to background psychological disturbance or

substance abuse within the patient in the western examples of violence, it doesn't have abundant

implication within the current situation of violence against doctors that has engulfed this country.

Heightened anxiety concerning the disease additionally as finance required for the sickness appear

to be a vital component of initiation of violence and also the doctor should train himself/herself for

anxiety alleviation techniques.

Studies have shown seniority of the doctor matters, i.e. a senior doctor faces less violence than

junior doctors, whether or not this can be associated with less exposure of senior doctors to

explosive scenario or his/her better handling the situation, his/her political Influence or obtaining

respect from patient's relatives because of his/her long years of experience has not been looked

into.


Bereavement, young patient under serious condition, only earning member within the family and

solely kid with serious sickness evolve emotional outburst which can quickly end in violence. Doctor

ought to have good training to tackle these things. Long waiting hours and doctor's behavior towards

patients and relatives are necessary contributors to aggression and want to be addressed by the

doctor the maximum period as possible.

Doctors most likely should attempt to optimize and reduce long waiting periods for the patients in

the waiting rooms and try to improve patient contact as much as possible. Use of digital technology,

mobile phones, is also helpful to achieve this end. For example, it's repeatedly been seen that long

queues within the hospital, lack of Communication from the doctors and opaque charge systems are

necessary predictors of violence in India. Both digital and mobile technology will well help during this

area.


What The Hospital Should Do?

Hospitals will do abundant to reduce the violence. In government hospitals, this can be done as a

part of general reform for the hospital services in the form of:

i. Improvement of services in an exceedingly world fashion;


ii. employment of adequate number of doctors and different steps to ease the rush of patients

and long waiting hours;

iii. use of pc and web technology;

iv. hospital security ought to be strong and it must be properly interlocked with near police

station;

v. no arms/ammunition by patient or their relatives should be allowed in the hospital;

vi. there should be transparency on rates of various investigations, rents and different expenses

within the hospital; and

vii. there should be a correct complaint redressal system within the hospital.


What The Patient Family And Society At Large Should Do To Prevent The Violence?

There is large responsibility of patients, their relatives and society at large to stop this violence.

Disputes between patients and hospitals or doctors don't seem to be to be sorted through violence,

however in an exceedingly civilized society; there are avenues of dispute redressal that should be

used. Modern drugs are neither low cost nor 100% effective in curing the illness in all cases. There

shouldn't be under expectation on the result of the treatment in a serious case.

Some patients will make it, some patients won't. This could be clearly understood. There should be

an understanding that destruction and violence in the hospital or clinic could be a criminal offense

and any civilized society ought to have low tolerance for such atrocious acts. Hardly social leaders

are seen to condemn such violence these days, and surprisingly they fight to justify the case.

Responsibility Of The Media

It is the responsibility of each print and electronic media to not sensationalize the news. Medicine

isn't a black and white subject and so its management. Diagnosis of a patient is basically hypothetic

deductive method, and with new proof through investigations and data, the diagnosis of a number

of the cases continues to be refined. However, whatever the diagnosis be, the management of

patient usually includes such uncertainties into consideration and treatment continues.


Responsibility Of The Government And Political Parties

In India, the reason for violence against doctors is multi-layered. Spending around one per cent of

the GDP by the govt. in a very population that exaggerated five times since independence isn't

enough. Modern medicine is progressing by leaps and bounds, but most of the medical faculties and

hospitals within the country could not keep place with the progress. The government must place the

hassle to check the overcrowding in the hospitals are often prevented.

No nation will build hospitals for 1300 million patients, but it is possible to build hospital for 1300

million voters who are mostly healthy. To keep 1300 million people healthy in a very country like

India may be a Hercules task. Nutrition, immunization, pollution control, health education, personal

hygiene, access to wash water, unadulterated milk, pure food, facilities for exercise, playground, and


etc. are the essential needs. The government should concentrate its activities on preventive drugs.

The govt. ought to penalize unlawful behavior of anybody who tends to harms the doctor and

vandalizes the hospital.

Conclusion

Although violence against doctors and alternative health workers isn't uncommon, the incidence in

India appears to be increasing. Several remedies have been suggested to tackle this case, a number

of those are discussed here. As there are some responsibilities of doctors and other health

employees, similarly, responsibilities even have to be borne by patients and their relatives, hospitals

authorities, political parties, law maintaining machinery, media and government to see that health

care improves and violence against doctors is handled.

There's a requirement for a detailed longitudinal study across the country to understand the

prevalence, nature and regional differences in violence perpetrated against doctors in this country.

The current study by Indian Medical Association (IMA) reports that seventy five per cent of doctors

in India have faced violence at some point of time in their life, and most of the time, it's verbal

abuse. Emergency and ICU are the foremost violent venues and visiting hours is the most violent

time. There is no reason now to prevent this violence against doctors and take preventive measures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Section 58B of The Advocates Act - Special provision relating to certain disciplinary proceedings

 Section 58B The Advocates Act Description (1) As from the 1st day of September, 1963, every proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate of a High Court shall, save as provided in the first proviso to sub-section (2), be disposed of by the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if the existing advocate had been enrolled as an advocate on its roll. (2) If immediately before the said date, there is any proceeding in respect of any disciplinary matter in relation to an existing advocate pending before any High Court under the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 (38 of 1926), such proceeding shall stand transferred to the State Bar Council in relation to that High Court, as if it were a proceeding pending before the corresponding Bar Council under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 56: Provided that where in respect of any such proceeding the High Court has received the finding of a Tribunal constituted under section 11 of the Indian B

Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of ClaimantCase Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant. TOLLEY Vs, J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement. Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be asked to resign from his respective club. Furthermore, there was evidence that the possible adverse effects of the caricature on the claimant’s reputation were brought to the defendants’ attention. The trial judge found that the caricature could have a defamatory meaning. The jury then found in favor of the claimant. Held The House of Lords held that in the circumstances of this case – as explained by the facts – the caricature was capable of constituting defamation. In other words, the publication could have the meaning alleged by the claimant. The Lords also ordered a new trial limited to the assessment of damages. NEWSTEAD V LANDON EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD, (1939) Facts: A newspaper published a defamatory article about Harold Newstead. However, another person with this name brought an action in libel. He claimed that the article had been misunderstood as leading to him. The defendant newspaper recognised that they published the article. Also, they denied that they had the intention of being defamatory of him. Consequently, the claimant argued that the newspaper was under a duty. The duty was to give a clear and complete description of the correct person. Moreover, the claimant argued that the defendants were in breach of the duty. Issues: The issue in Newstead v London Express Newspaper, was if the reasonable persons would have understood the words complained of to refer to the plaintiff. Held: The Court of Appeal stated that in accordance with the current law on libel, liability for libel does not depend on the intention of the defamer; but on the fact of the defamation. Accordingly, a reasonable man, in this case a newspaper publisher, must be aware of the possibility of individuals with the same name and must assume that the words published will be read by a reasonable man with reasonable care.

  Case Laws related to Defamation in favour of Claimant.  TOLLEY  Vs,  J.S FRY & SONS LTD – (1931) Facts The defendants were owners of chocolate manufacturing company. They advertised their products with a caricature of the claimant, who was a prominent amateur golfer, showing him with the defendants’ chocolate in his pocket while playing golf. The advertisement compared the excellence of the chocolate to the excellence of the claimant’s drive. The claimant did not consent to or knew about the advertisement.   Issue The claimant alleged that the advertisement suggested that he agreed to his portrait being used for commercial purposes and for financial gain. He further claimed that the use of his image made him look like someone who prostituted his reputation for advertising purposes and was thus unworthy of his status. At trial, several golfers gave evidence to the effect that if an amateur sold himself for advertisement, he no longer maintained his amateur status and might be aske

Rules as to delivery of goods

                             Rules as to delivery of goods Section 2(2) of Sale of Goods Act defines ‘delivery’ as a ‘voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.’ Thus, if the transfer of goods is not voluntary and is taken by theft, by fraud, or by force, then there is no ‘delivery. Moreover, the ‘delivery’ should have the effect of putting the goods in possession of the buyer. The essence of the delivery is a voluntary transfer of possession of goods from one person to another. There is no delivery of goods where they are obtained at pistol point or theft. 1. Mode of Delivery: According to Section 33, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorized to hold them on his behalf. Delivery of goods may be actual, symbolic or constructive. 2. Expenses of Delivery: According to Section 36(5), unless otherwise agree